Most launchpad platforms operate on a simple but brutal principle: whoever clicks fastest gets the token allocation, dumps it earliest, and leaves regular participants holding losses. Speed over substance—that's the traditional playbook.
But here's where things get interesting. Some newer projects are actually rethinking this whole model. Instead of rewarding pure reflexes, they're designing mechanics that incentivize genuine network participation and long-term commitment.
AlignerZ Labs is an example worth watching. Their approach shifts the narrative from extractive speedruns to behavior patterns that actually strengthen ecosystem health. It's a different philosophy—one that makes you wonder why more launchpads haven't considered doing the same.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerumDegen
· 5h ago
ngl this whole "align incentives" angle sounds nice until the devs themselves become the biggest dumpers lmao... seen this movie before
Reply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 13h ago
The old-fashioned speed race has long been played out. The idea of AlignerZ is indeed interesting, but whether it can survive in the long run depends on subsequent execution.
View OriginalReply0
DevChive
· 01-02 19:52
That's what I was talking about. Someone should have done this a long time ago. Traditional launchpads are just a hot potato game.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 01-02 19:52
NGL, this mechanism reform sounds very idealistic... How many of them can actually be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-02 19:50
NGL, this mechanism sounds good, but how many can really stick with it...
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 01-02 19:38
ngl this "who's faster wins" model definitely needs to change, I've been annoyed with it for a long time
---
Wait, can AlignerZ really break this curse? Or is it just another new concept hype
---
To be honest, in the end, it's all about who has the big funds...
---
Finally someone dares to move this piece of cake, feels pretty good
---
Actions speak louder than words, let's wait and see, everyone
---
I like this idea, much better than those pure money-grabbing schemes
---
Huh? Competing in participation? Then I, a retail investor, have no chance...
---
Ecosystem health sounds great, but the actual situation depends on the data
---
Another new concept, new narrative. When can it truly change the current situation?
Most launchpad platforms operate on a simple but brutal principle: whoever clicks fastest gets the token allocation, dumps it earliest, and leaves regular participants holding losses. Speed over substance—that's the traditional playbook.
But here's where things get interesting. Some newer projects are actually rethinking this whole model. Instead of rewarding pure reflexes, they're designing mechanics that incentivize genuine network participation and long-term commitment.
AlignerZ Labs is an example worth watching. Their approach shifts the narrative from extractive speedruns to behavior patterns that actually strengthen ecosystem health. It's a different philosophy—one that makes you wonder why more launchpads haven't considered doing the same.