Volatile Start for Crypto ETFs in February as Bitcoin Lags and XRP Shines

BTC0,45%
ETHW-1,14%
XRP0,22%

A volatile first full week of February left crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) sharply divided, with bitcoin and ether absorbing sustained pressure while XRP quietly delivered a strong showing. Rapid daily reversals underscored a market still searching for conviction.

Extreme Reversals Mark Crypto ETFs as XRP Defies Market Stress

The first week of February delivered sharp mood swings across crypto ETFs, with heavy selling early in the week giving way to late rebounds that ultimately fell short of reversing broader losses.

Bitcoin spot ETFs closed the Feb. 2–6 window with a net outflow of -$318 million, despite a powerful late-week bounce. Blackrock’s IBIT oscillated violently, absorbing large outflows midweek before rebounding strongly on Friday, finishing the week with a -$115.14 million drawdown.

Fidelity’s FBTC bore sustained pressure, logging heavy redemptions across multiple sessions and ending the week deeply negative with a -$166.73 million exit. Grayscale’s GBTC (-$173.82 million) contributed a sizable weekly outflow of -$173.82 million, although its Bitcoin Mini Trust finished modestly positive with $18.39 million net inflow.

Bitwise’s BITB and Ark & 21Shares’ ARKB also remained net sellers, while smaller allocations into Invesco’s BTCO and Wisdomtree’s BTCW provided only marginal relief. Friday’s $371 million inflow underscored renewed dip-buying interest, but it wasn’t enough to offset earlier damage in the week.

Ether spot ETFs recorded -$166 million in net weekly outflows, extending their fragile trend. Blackrock’s ETHA (-$152.16 million) led the drawdowns with consistent redemptions, firmly anchoring ether ETF weakness. Fidelity’s FETH (-$59.89 million) added meaningful losses, particularly midweek.

Grayscale’s ETHE (-$18.83 million) and Ether Mini Trust ($32.97 million) saw mixed flows, with brief inflows unable to counter persistent selling. Smaller products like Bitwise’s ETHW($16.79 million), Vaneck’s ETHV ($8.19 million), and Invesco’s QETH ($7.13 million) provided intermittent support but lacked scale, as subdued conviction remained around ether exposure.

Volatile Start for Crypto ETFs in February as Bitcoin Lags and XRP ShinesThree consecutive weekly outflows for ether ETFs. XRP spot ETFs stood apart as the clear winner, posting $39 million in net weekly inflows. Franklin’s XRPZ ($20.50 million) and Bitwise’s XRP ($20.01 million) consistently attracted capital throughout the week, while Canary’s XRPC ($3.44 million) added steady secondary support. Grayscale’s GXRP briefly saw redemptions but failed to derail the broader trend. XRP’s resilience marked a strong rebound from last week’s net outflows.

Solana spot ETFs ended the week with -$8.9 million in net outflows, despite pockets of buying. Bitwise’s BSOL (-$8.61 million) saw notable midweek redemptions, partially offset by inflows into Fidelity’s FSOL ($5.19 million). Grayscale’s GSOL leaned negative, while smaller products such as Vaneck’s VSOL, Franklin’s SOEZ, and 21Shares’ TSOL fluctuated without establishing momentum.

Read more: ETF Recap: Crypto ETFs End January in Deep Retreat With $1.8 Billion Exit

Overall, the week captured a market still struggling to stabilize. Bitcoin and ether remain trapped in volatile push-and-pull dynamics, Solana searched for footing, and XRP emerged quietly but decisively, as the standout in an otherwise unsettled ETF market.

FAQ 📊

  • Why were crypto ETFs so volatile in early February?

Rapid risk-on, risk-off rotations drove sharp daily reversals as investors lacked conviction.

  • How did bitcoin ETFs perform for the week?

Bitcoin ETFs saw a $318 million net outflow despite strong dip-buying late in the week.

  • Why did ether ETFs stay under pressure?

Persistent redemptions from large funds like ETHA and FETH outweighed smaller inflows.

  • What explains XRP ETFs outperforming the market?

Consistent inflows suggest renewed confidence in XRP amid broader crypto ETF stress.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Gerelateerde artikelen

加密恐慌与贪婪指数升至16,市场恐慌情绪小幅缓解

Gate News 消息,4月12日,据 Alternative 数据,今日加密货币恐慌与贪婪指数为16(昨日为15),市场恐慌情绪小幅缓解。该指数阈值为0-100,综合6项指标计算:波动性(25%)、市场交易量(25%)、社交媒体热度(15%)、市场调查(15%)、比特币在整个市场中的比例(10%)、谷歌热词分析(10%)。

GateNews18m geleden

SpaceX 持有价值约 6.03 亿美元比特币,同期因整合 xAI 录得近 50 亿美元亏损

Gate News 消息,4 月 12 日,SpaceX 目前持有价值约 6.03 亿美元的比特币。同期,该公司因整合 xAI 录得近 50 亿美元的亏损。尽管录得大额亏损,SpaceX 的比特币持仓自 2024 年中期以来保持不变,未有减持迹象。

GateNews46m geleden

《紐約時報》再掀「中本聰身分謎團」,Adam Back 被鎖定後火速澄清

作者:Nancy,PANews 中本聰的真實身份,依然是加密世界延續 17 年的謎團。圍繞這一化名的猜測從未停止,從密碼學家到企業創始人,各種候選人輪番登場,但始終缺乏能夠一錘定音的證據。 近期,《紐約時報》發布萬字調查,從語言風格、技術路徑與歷史脈絡出發的多重比對,將 Blockstream 執行長 Adam Back 列為最有力的中本聰候選人。然而,這項說法很快就遭到本人明確否認,相關論點也被業界普遍質疑難以成立。 中本聰身分爭議再起,萬字調查鎖定 Adam Back 在這項調查中,《紐約時報》記者 John Carreyrou 花了一年多時間,深入梳理數十年來的檔案、密碼龐克郵件列表以

区块客2u geleden
Opmerking
0/400
Geen opmerkingen