Prominent crypto market analysts are maintaining a constructive outlook on Ethereum going forward. The view reflects confidence in ETH's fundamentals and its positioning within the broader digital asset ecosystem. Ethereum continues to be closely monitored by institutional observers and market participants tracking DeFi developments and blockchain infrastructure evolution. This type of bullish sentiment on major cryptocurrencies often influences broader market conversations around layer-1 protocols and their long-term potential.

The current crypto market is experiencing an interesting divergence. On one hand, technological progress in public chains like Ethereum is steadily advancing; on the other hand, the market enthusiasm for MEME coins continues to heat up. The parallel operation of these two forces reveals the true picture of the market. Progress on the technical front is tangible. The launch of the Ethereum Dencun upgrade has significantly reduced Layer2 gas fees—by as much as 90%. This is not just a numerical improvement but also represents an expansion of ecosystem capacity. When transaction costs are greatly reduced, the barrier to user adoption also drops, laying a foundation for subsequent ecosystem development. From historical experience, every major technological upgrade is often accompanied by a revaluation of ecosystem projects. Meanwhile, market sentiment is also particularly noteworthy. Established MEME coins like DOGE and SHIB remain popular, while emerging tokens such as PEPE and BONK demonstrate strong growth momentum. Daily increases of 39% or even doubling are common occurrences. These tokens often rely on community consensus and cultural dissemination to drive value, reflecting the activity level of retail investors. Interestingly, these two tracks represent two different market logics: one based on long-term value considerations rooted in infrastructure improvement and ecosystem expansion, and the other driven by short-term sentiment resonance and liquidity concentration. They are both independent and coexist within the same market. For participants, this divergence brings both opportunities and complexity in choices. Should they focus on building a solid technical foundation, or engage in emotion-driven volatility? Or seek a balance between the two? Each person's answer may differ, and this diversity of market participation itself is a reflection of market vitality.

How difficult is it to build traditional financial services? System development, institutional endorsement, compliance approval—the processes are so complex they are almost despair-inducing, and security vulnerabilities must be constantly guarded against. Decades of internet development have solved communication issues, but rules regarding asset ownership and contract execution remain a mystery. Economic activities have been fully digitized, yet rights records are still chaotic and disorganized. The emergence of Ethereum has changed all of this. It embeds ownership and obligation logic directly into code, relying on global nodes for collective verification—no one can cheat. Previously, issuing a blockchain required top-tier technical teams and huge capital investment. Now, with Ethereum’s shared security model, it can be achieved with just a few lines of code. Capital-intensive infrastructure construction instantly transforms into a purely technical problem. Even more impressively, Ethereum does not aim to dismantle the traditional financial institutions’ roles but instead automates tedious processes like bookkeeping, authorization, and dispute resolution through software. Institutions no longer need to maintain redundant complex systems, freeing up resources to focus on product innovation. Previously, cross-border payments required bank approval, high fees, and took three to five days to arrive; on Ethereum, settlement occurs in seconds, and costs are drastically reduced. Contract execution also shifts from disputes and delays to automatic code triggers, completely eliminating human lag. Most importantly, there is the global shared ledger. Previously, each institution maintained its own database, often causing reconciliation failures and errors. Now, with a single, transparent, immutable ledger, all transaction records are clear at a glance, and efficiency has increased by more than ten times.