People who make encryption payments are all asking the same question:
“Which road can really make money?”
I've heard many industry stories, but there are really not many that can actually make money.
Today I want to strip away all the “mysticism” outside and just talk about reality:
The only three categories where encryption payments are truly profitable now are: channels, compliance, and high-risk services. Other directions are basically powered by love.
By understanding these three categories, you basically know where the money flows in this industry, where the barriers are, and how you should enter the market.
If you strip down the business models of all encryption payment institutions to the bone, only one question remains:
Who can send money to its destination the fastest, the most securely, and with the least trouble?
If you can do this, you can collect fees, take a bit of a spread, and gain some stickiness.
This is the “vascular system” of the entire industry. All Web3 projects, gaming companies, cross-border trade, and e-commerce cannot bypass this matter.
Why make money?
Transaction fees ranging from 0.3% to 2% have buyers willing to pay.
Future regulations will only become stricter, which means:
Channels will become more expensive, and there will be fewer people who can do it.
Obvious trend: Companies no longer want to distinguish between “fiat vs stablecoin”; they just want it to be usable, cheap, and fast.
More and more companies will:
Enterprises do not care whether it is on the chain or not, they only care about “speed, stability, and compliance.”
Being able to help enterprises handle cross-border wages and cross-border settlements is itself a very profitable business.
Citibank, HSBC, and Standard Chartered have all issued their own on-chain “deposit tokens.”
This indicates a reality:
Bank-level cross-border payments are also beginning to migrate to the blockchain. When you see banks issuing tokens, it is a sign that the industry is entering a mature phase.
The profit margin for B2B large-scale cross-border transactions is far more stable than that of the retail sector. This area is expected to explode in the future because it truly addresses the old issues of “large-scale cross-border payments”: slow, expensive, and opaque.
The further you go, the more obvious it becomes: you will find that in the encryption payment industry, what is most valuable in encryption payment is not “technology”, but “compliance capability”.
Many enterprises do not want to spend a year and a half applying for a license, nor do they want to bear the risk of rejection, so they choose:
“Rent” others' licenses, structures, KYC systems, and risk control systems.
This is “license as a service”.
The logic of demand is simple: Instead of spending a year applying for a license, it’s better to integrate in a month.
The profit structure of this type of service is stable in the long term:
Fixed monthly fee + per usage fee.
Essentially, it is a subscription service that sells “compliance capabilities.”
As long as it is a service that “banks don't like to do but the market really needs”, the profits are very high. Such businesses generally start with a handling fee of 3%–10%, but you have to take on all the responsibilities of KYC, risk control, chargebacks, and being “greeted” by the bank.
Transaction fees range from 3% to 10%.
The reason is simple:
Regular institutions dare not act, those who dare to act can collect premiums.
However —— the risk control and compliance pressure for this type of business is very high, without experience, it is easy to fail.
I summarized the most obvious trends in the industry into three sentences:
USDC/EURC/tokenized deposits have exploded this year.
Citibank, Standard Chartered, and HSBC have announced their entry.
Whoever can help enterprises run stablecoin cross-border settlements will be able to seize the biggest cake for the next three years.
Traditional payroll does not handle cross-border + stablecoins well.
Web3 project teams and AI companies are hiring globally, turning on-chain salaries into everyday system requirements.
This will eventually run out as a “Deel for on-chain compensation.”
The past model of “each finding their own suppliers” is disappearing.
Now companies are more willing to directly purchase: structural design, compliance system, KYC/AML, complete document package, and an operational channel (MSB, VA1, MPI, CASP, etc.)
Companies are willing to pay for this overall solution of “from design to implementation.” This is a long-term, stable, and continuous growth direction.
In a nutshell:
Choose the type that you can do, do not try to cover all three types.
This industry makes money not by gimmicks, but by solid execution capabilities.
Many bosses will ask at this point:
“Then I will make an encryption payment, what specifically can you help me with?”
Let me summarize the core services we have been providing for many years in Web3, payment, U Card, and stablecoin projects, which are all “practical and usable things”:
including but not limited to:
These are the keys to whether a business can operate smoothly.
Not in concept, but in practice:
Includes:
In one sentence:
You want to make payments, I can help you streamline the entire process from “business design → compliance structure → document system → bank channel” until it can truly go live and operate.
Related Articles
USDC Treasury destroys 50 million USDC on the Ethereum chain
Resolv Protocol Exploited – Attacker Swaps 200K USDC for $23.8 Million in Major Security Breach
Resolv Attacker Spent 200,000 USDC to Mint 80 Million USR, Already Purchased 9,111 ETH