On March 3rd, it was reported that the prediction market Kalshi sparked controversy over the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Its “death clause” details resulted in minimal profits for traders betting on his removal. Traders initially believed that betting on Khamenei’s ousting before February 28th was a guaranteed win, but Kalshi emphasized that only death or other official causes of death count as a formal removal, and settlement will be based on the last trading price before the death news was confirmed. The CEO of Kalshi later apologized to users and announced refunds of related fees.
As the US and Israel launched joint airstrikes against Iran, trading volume in prediction markets surged, attracting global attention. On Polymarket’s international platform, six new users bet on Khamenei’s removal, with total transactions reaching $1.2 million. However, since Polymarket is not regulated by the US and lacks KYC and AML procedures, risks of regulatory issues and insider trading are difficult to control. Kalshi requires users to verify their identities, improving market regulation, but the “death clause” still caused dissatisfaction among users.
Analysts point out that the challenges faced by prediction markets are not only ethical debates but also balancing commercialization with compliance. Markets lacking strict KYC and AML procedures limit institutional investor participation, making normalization difficult. US Senator Chris Murphy criticized some individuals for potentially profiting from war and death, calling for legislation to ban such trading, while a White House spokesperson denied involvement by the Trump team.
This incident highlights the risks and regulatory gaps in prediction markets concerning sensitive political events, and serves as a reminder for traders to pay attention to contract details and settlement rules to avoid unexpected losses due to clause omissions.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Gate Daily Report (April 13): The CFTC seeks “exclusive regulatory authority” for prediction markets; the FBI report says crypto fraud losses totaled 113.6 billion.
Bitcoin has pulled back from its peak to $71,110. The chair of the U.S. CFTC said it will defend its regulatory authority over prediction markets. An FBI report shows that in 2025, losses from cryptocurrency fraud reached $11.36 billion, with seniors hit the hardest. The market is optimistic in the short term, but you should be mindful of the impact of oil prices and monetary policy.
MarketWhisper2h ago
CFTC Chair: Predicts that market oversight authority is exclusively federal; states have no power to replace it with state law
CFTC Chair Mike Selig emphasized that the CFTC has the only regulatory authority over prediction markets, and that states cannot replace federal oversight. At the same time, the CFTC is clarifying regulatory details through rulemaking and welcomes public input. In addition, the digital asset classification guidance jointly released by the CFTC and the SEC will help businesses clearly determine the nature of digital assets.
GateNews3h ago
Polymarket profit exceeds $1.8 million; an account purchase of $400k on the NBA Magic point spread bet to win against the Celtics
In an NBA regular-season matchup between the Magic and the Celtics, one account has invested over $370k to bet on the Magic to cover the spread. The Magic are currently leading, and the game is in the halftime stage.
GateNews5h ago
Sports betting contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local law enforcement and seeks regulatory control over prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working together with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority for Kalshi prediction markets from local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and provide uniform national regulation, reducing the influence of state-level gambling laws.
CryptoCity11h ago
Ruling sports betting contracts are derivatives! The U.S. CFTC blocks local enforcement efforts and pushes to take regulatory control of prediction markets
The U.S. federal government is working together with the CFTC and the Department of Justice to try to shift regulatory authority over Kalshi’s prediction markets from state and local governments to the federal level, arguing that sports-event contracts are financial derivatives. If the court supports this position, it will change the legal status of prediction markets and standardize regulation nationwide, reducing the influence of local gambling laws.
CryptoCity14h ago
