The death of Iran’s leader sparks controversy in prediction markets; Kalshi refunds $2.2 million, with the CEO claiming they refused “death arbitrage.” Before the airstrike, U.S. lawmakers demanded strict scrutiny of contracts related to war and assassination predictions, with a deadline to respond by March 9.
Kalshi’s “Khamenei Resignation” Prediction Contract Sparks Debate
Following the joint U.S. and Israeli airstrikes that resulted in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated that their platform’s trading volume exceeded $50 million on contracts related to the event. He emphasized that their goal was to prevent investors from profiting from the death.
The contract was titled: “Will Khamenei step down as Iran’s Supreme Leader?” with rules stating that if Khamenei dies, settlement would be based on the last trading price before death. When news of Khamenei’s death broke, a surge of funds flooded into the contract, and Kalshi suspended trading due to settlement chaos.
Kalshi later admitted that the settlement terms contained ambiguous language and ultimately decided to refund users’ net losses. Sources told Bloomberg that this move cost the platform about $2.2 million.
Kalshi’s Promotion and Settlement Standards Under Fire
After Kalshi processed refunds, criticism emerged within the community, mainly because Kalshi had promoted this contract at the time of the event. Last Saturday morning, news of Khamenei’s death began circulating, Kalshi posted on X: “Breaking: The probability of Khamenei no longer serving as Iran’s Supreme Leader has surged to 68%,” which Mansour also retweeted.
Image source: X
Former SEC Chief of Staff Amanda Fischer criticized this, saying Kalshi’s actions were akin to providing a marketplace for assassination proxies.
Users also criticized Kalshi’s settlement standards, pointing out that when Jimmy Carter passed away, the platform settled his contract as “no,” accusing the platform of only applying special terms when losing money.
Dennis Kelleher, CEO of Better Markets, stated that Kalshi’s actions reveal an attempt to balance expanding trading volume with avoiding clear laws banning assassination-related bets.
Prediction Markets Cross the Line, U.S. Lawmakers Call for Investigation
Prediction markets are often seen as “anything can be traded,” but this incident highlights their limits. Before the U.S.-Israel airstrikes on Iran, California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff sent a letter to CFTC Chair Michael Selig demanding strict regulation of contracts related to war and assassination, with a response deadline of March 9.
Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Murphy also announced he is drafting legislation to ban such market contracts to prevent insider trading and manipulation based on known outcomes. The Kalshi settlement controversy proves that such betting markets should not exist.
Polymarket’s Wordplay Sparks Controversy
Compared to Kalshi, Polymarket still hosts 187 Iran-related markets. One of these predicts whether the U.S. will forcibly remove Khamenei before March 31. Polymarket ultimately settled this contract as “no,” reasoning that the U.S. only contributed or assisted in the killing, which sparked strong dissatisfaction among some commentators and calls for dispute resolution.
Because Polymarket relies on blockchain-based decentralized settlement mechanisms, the fairness of contract judgments remains under scrutiny.
On-chain data shows that, hours before the airstrike, six anonymous wallets collectively bet on “U.S. attacking Iran before February 28,” ultimately earning about $1.2 million. These wallets were almost all newly created accounts in February, with funds transferred within 24 hours before the event. Such suspicious trading patterns have raised concerns about military secrets leaking and potential on-chain insider arbitrage.
Related report:
Pre-airstrike prediction? Polymarket traders bet on US-Iran war, earning $1.2 million, sparking controversy
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
U.S. House pressures the CFTC, demanding answers to six questions about insider trading in prediction markets
Seven members of the U.S. House of Representatives sent a letter to the CFTC Chair, questioning the regulator’s lack of enforcement regarding insider trading in prediction markets related to Iran and Venezuela, and requesting answers to six questions from the CFTC. The incident has sparked concerns about the legitimacy of prediction markets and the strength of regulatory oversight, and the CFTC has pledged to pursue selective enforcement. As the market expands, in the absence of clear regulations, investors need to pay attention to possible policy changes and their impacts.
GateNews1h ago
Polymarket bets on a U.S.-Iran ceasefire and makes a staggering 3,500% profit—are insider trading allegations heating up?
As U.S.-Iran tensions ease, asset prices rebound. Some traders have predicted the market with pinpoint accuracy to profit from ceasefire gains, sparking discussion about insider trading. Although there is no evidence yet, frequent cases have challenged market fairness, and regulators have begun to pay attention. Polymarket has also updated its rules to strengthen market integrity. The industry faces a key question of balancing openness with compliance.
GateNews2h ago
3 Polymarket traders made a timely bet on a US-Iran ceasefire
Three newly created wallets profited a combined $484,575 on Polymarket betting that the US and Iran would agree to a ceasefire by Tuesday, in the latest event to raise suspicion of insider trading.
The wallets were created and funded on Tuesday and had no prior activity before betting on Polymarket
Cointelegraph4h ago
Four suspected insider addresses bet on a U.S.-Iran ceasefire and profited about $663k
Gate News message, April 8, according to monitoring by Lookonchain, four suspected insider-trading addresses profited by about $663k by betting on a U.S.-Iran ceasefire before April 7. Most of these wallets were created on April 7 and funded after that; a few hours before the ceasefire news was released, they bought the “YES” option. Previously, there was no activity record—only a bet on this event—entered at extremely low odds (3.9%).
GateNews6h ago
The market predictor ADI Predictstreet will launch on April 9, and has become the official World Cup 2026 partner.
Gate News update: On April 8, according to the ADI Predictstreet official website, the prediction market platform ADI Predictstreet will go live officially on April 9. Previously, the platform had reached a multi-year cooperation agreement with FIFA, becoming the official prediction market partner for the 2026 World Cup.
GateNews7h ago
Gate Daily Report (April 8): Resolv leak impacts treasury liquidity; Fox and Kalshi reach a data partnership
Bitcoin (BTC) has recently rebounded to $71,520, but due to a Resolv USD private key leak, some vault liquidity is insufficient, and Trading Protocol warns users to deposit with caution. Fox and Kalshi have partnered to integrate prediction market data into news programs, demonstrating the importance of data in media. The market is reacting sharply to developments in the Middle East; investors are waiting for Trump’s decisions, which is affecting overall market sentiment.
MarketWhisper9h ago
