Minnesota State Legislature Considers Legislation to Ban Fake Cryptocurrency Kiosks Amid Rising Fraud Cases
The Minnesota State Legislature has heard opinions from law enforcement and the crypto industry regarding the widespread fraud involving cryptocurrency kiosks. Law enforcement officials suggest banning these physical devices through legislation to curb crypto scams, while crypto operators argue that industry regulation should be strengthened instead of outright bans. Minnesota currently has 350 cryptocurrency vending machines operated by ten companies. These fake machines make it difficult for consumers to distinguish real from fake and are unregulated. Lawmakers and industry players disagree on how to ensure public safety and eliminate scams, adding more uncertainty and political conflict to the state’s ongoing issues with crypto fraud.
Fake vending machines hidden inside gas stations deceive victims into believing they are legitimate
Minnesota’s fake crypto machines specifically target low-income seniors. One elderly victim was tricked into buying cryptocurrency at a gas station kiosk. He invests half of his fixed monthly income in Bitcoin for eight months, ultimately facing homelessness due to financial ruin. Law enforcement officials note that scam groups are highly alert, often luring victims to gas stations or grocery stores with crypto kiosks, then converting cash into untraceable funds. These machines resemble real ATMs, allowing users to buy crypto with cash or debit cards. Once the money is deposited, it is transferred into the scammer’s crypto wallet and then moved overseas.
Law enforcement cannot recover most illicit proceeds, causing severe losses
Police say that funds transferred to overseas digital wallets often fall outside local jurisdiction, making investigations extremely difficult. Although Minnesota passed laws in 2024 limiting new customers’ deposits at crypto kiosks to $2,000 and requiring operators to issue refunds under certain conditions, enforcement has been limited. Commerce officials point out that scam groups are adept at bypassing warnings and limits by making multiple small deposits. Additionally, some victims are instructed to cross state lines into Wisconsin, where regulations are more lenient, to use the devices.
Data from the Faribault Police Department shows that since 2022, residents have lost over $500,000 to crypto kiosk scams in the city. When including unreported cases, total losses could reach up to $2 million. Supporters of a ban compare these devices to cigarette vending machines in public spaces, arguing that they should be fully restricted for the public’s benefit. Opponents, however, believe the government should focus on encouraging cooperation between operators and law enforcement rather than banning legitimate physical businesses.
Crypto industry opposes a complete ban on vending machines
Operators like digital currency platform CoinFlip oppose a total ban, arguing that crypto kiosks are not the only method used in scams. Industry representatives suggest the state should implement stricter regulations, such as mandatory cooling-off periods after transactions to allow for the cancellation of suspicious trades, and revoke licenses of companies that fail to provide refunds. The Commerce Committee has postponed the bill for future review, with bipartisan lawmakers negotiating consumer protection provisions. If passed, the bill would regulate only physical vending machines and would not affect online crypto transactions.
Related Articles
David Sacks Calls on Banks After Crypto Policy Shift
Former Mt. Gox CEO proposes hard fork to recover $5.2 billion USD worth of Bitcoin from the 2011 theft
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins blasts former Gensler: "Stifling Innovation" — The U.S. Missed Major Opportunities in Cryptocurrency
The UK plans to open up cryptocurrencies for legal gambling payments, with regulatory pathways in development and possibly implemented by 2027.
The U.S. Congress promotes the "Promoting Blockchain Development and Innovation Act," proposing to amend Section 1960 to establish a "safe harbor" for open-source developers.
The negotiations for the CLARITY Act are still ongoing, and the battle over stablecoin yields is heating up. March 1 is not the final deadline.