Open-source project Tldraw announces suspension of accepting external contributions due to overwhelming AI-generated junk code. Such “AI Slop” severely drains maintainers’ energy, and the community is exploring the establishment of reputation systems or escrow mechanisms to address this issue.
Overwhelmed by AI-generated content, open-source project Tldraw suspends external PRs
A popular open-source web drawing project on GitHub with over 40,000 stars, Tldraw, recently announced that it will suspend accepting pull requests (PRs) from external contributors.
Developer steveruizok pointed out that, like many open-source projects on GitHub, the team has recently observed a significant increase in contributions generated entirely by AI tools. Although some submissions are correct in form, most lack complete context, misunderstand the codebase, and the submitters rarely participate in discussions afterward.
steveruizok emphasized that an open PR represents a commitment from maintainers, meaning the contribution will be carefully reviewed and seriously considered for inclusion. To keep this promise meaningful, the team must implement stricter filtering.
Currently, Tldraw’s policy is to close all external PRs first, only reopening those that are genuinely considered. This is in the best interest of the project and code quality. Although it’s regrettable to close public contributions, steveruizok stated that they will only consider reopening once GitHub introduces better management tools.
Curl and OCaml also affected, AI Slop rampant
The decision to suspend pull requests at Tldraw is just one recent example of AI Slop (AI garbage) impacting the open-source community. Similar discussions have been heating up on Reddit and Hacker News forums.
A Reddit discussion pointed out that, Daniel Stenberg, maintainer of the well-known transfer tool Curl, revealed that the project is suffering from AI-generated erroneous reports being used in a “DDoS attack.” Approximately 20% of submissions in 2025 are AI garbage content, severely consuming volunteer maintainers’ time.
Additionally, OCaml maintainers have rejected a 13,000-line pull request generated by AI, citing that reviewing AI-produced code is more laborious than manually written code, and a flood of low-quality PRs could lead to system crashes.
Discussions on Hacker News focus on issues with GitHub’s mechanisms.
Some users believe that making PR counts prominent on the page encourages a culture of submitting for the sake of data.
The current dilemma with generative AI in open-source communities stems from many inexperienced developers using AI tools to generate worthless code, expecting maintainers to merge quickly. This behavior is damaging the collaborative trust within open-source communities.
Possible solutions: whitelist or reputation systems
In response to the harassment of garbage code (Shitcode) in open-source communities, Bitcoin developer Bryan Bishop (kanzure) responded on Tldraw’s GitHub page that he had proposed to the Bitcoin Core development team to “privatize” the development process, shifting to a model limited to invited members or requiring whitelist inclusion to post comments and PRs.
Although this might violate the spirit of Bitcoin’s openness, Bryan Bishop believes that it can effectively reduce noise and useless debates caused by non-contributors, allowing developers to focus on the technical aspects and prevent valuable attention from being diverted by malicious or invalid interactions.
Besides privatization, software engineer Steve Rodrigue also suggests establishing cross-project contributor reputation systems, verifying account value through trust networks.
Another developer is working on a blockchain-based “Stake-to-PR” protocol, requiring submitters to pay a small deposit, which is forfeited if the content is deemed AI garbage, and fully refunded if it is a valid contribution. The goal is to raise the barrier to curb AI abuse.
Further reading:
AI content flood! Web3 Dictionary names “Slop” as the 2025 Word of the Year, sparking heated discussions in the tech community
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
DeFi Protocol Moonwell Faces $1M Threat After Cheap Token Buy
_Moonwell faces $1M risk after attacker buys cheap tokens and submits malicious vote proposal to gain control of DeFi lending protocol contracts._
A decentralized finance platform called Moonwell is facing a serious security threat after a very cheap attack. The incident was a surprise to the
LiveBTCNews5h ago
Resolv: Strongly recommend not to trade or acquire USR at this time.
Resolv Labs strongly advises against trading or acquiring USR, as illegally minted USR has been mixed with legitimate USR, posing trading risks. An recovery plan for affected holders is currently under evaluation, but the effectiveness of any remedial measures cannot be guaranteed. Continuing to trade may complicate the asset recovery process.
BlockBeatNews9h ago
A CEX platform requires users to input their plaintext seed phrase on a specific page.
Gate News reports that on March 26, Co-founder Yu Xian of SlowMist stated that a certain CEX has taken down the page that required users to input their plaintext seed phrases. He pointed out that the security model for online web pages is very weak, much lower than that of extensions and apps; collecting plaintext seed phrases through online web pages is easy for phishing sites to imitate and has long been a common phishing tactic.
GateNews10h ago
Moonwell suffers governance attack; attacker attempts to control over $1 million in funds with $1,800.
DeFi lending protocol Moonwell has experienced a governance attack. The attacker purchased approximately 40 million MFAM tokens for $1,800 and attempted to transfer admin rights of core contracts such as the lending market through a proposal to extract user funds. Voting is currently underway, with opposition votes leading, but the outcome has not yet been decided.
BlockBeatNews11h ago
Moonwell suffers governance attack, with attackers spending $1,800 to push malicious proposals, risking $1.08 million in funds.
On March 26, DeFi lending protocol Moonwell was subjected to a governance attack. The attacker used about $1,800 to purchase 40 million MFAM tokens and pushed a malicious proposal, putting over $1 million of user funds at risk. The proposal transferred control to the attacker's contract, affecting multiple lending markets.
GateNews11h ago
U.S. Indicts Chinese Firms in Fentanyl Case Involving Crypto Payment Networks
U.S. prosecutors have indicted Chinese companies and nationals for supplying fentanyl precursors and facilitating payments via cryptocurrency. The case, linked to global networks and targeting international smuggling, highlights the role of stablecoin flows in the drug trade.
LiveBTCNews11h ago
