"Insider Whale" transferred 668,000 USDC to GMX to open a 95x leverage Bitcoin short order.

USDC-0,01%
GMX-1,52%
BTC0,43%
XRP1,27%

Odaily News According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, the “insider Whale” has just finished his shorting on Hyperliquid: he completely closed his XRP short order on Hyperliquid. This time he returned to the scene and reaped failure: 5 days ago he transferred 4.22 million USDC into Hyperliquid to start shorting, and after closing all positions today, he only has $668,000 USDC left, losing $355 million. Do you think he has admitted defeat? No, he changed casinos to continue playing: he withdrew the remaining 668,000 USDC after closing Hyperliquid and transferred it to GMX, then shorted BTC worth $5989 million with a leverage of up to 95x… opening price $114560, liquidation price $115131. This… just a slight fluctuation and he could be taken away…

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Whale Opens $50.6M Bitcoin Short Position on Hyperliquid After Liquidating 1,351 ETH

Gate News message, April 24 — A whale address beginning with 0x310 opened a 16x leveraged Bitcoin short position worth approximately $50.6 million over the past half hour, according to Hyperinsight monitoring. The position consists of 653 BTC at an average entry price of $77,470, with a

GateNews13m ago

Iran Collected Strait of Hormuz Toll in Foreign Currency, Not Bitcoin

Iran's central bank announced that the first transit fee collected from ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz was paid in "cash foreign currency," contradicting earlier reports that the toll would be collected in cryptocurrency. The payment was deposited directly into bank accounts in foreign c

CryptoFrontier14m ago

Balancer Hacker Converts 7,000 ETH to 204.7 BTC via THORChain Today

Gate News message, April 24 — The hacker who stole approximately $98 million in assets from Balancer in November 2025 has begun converting ETH to BTC through the cross-chain protocol THORChain. Today, the attacker exchanged 7,000 ETH for 204.7 BTC, valued at approximately $15.88 million, with

GateNews29m ago

Glassnode: Whales on Hyperliquid Maintain Long Positions, Expect Bitcoin Breakout

Gate News message, April 24 — According to Glassnode data, large traders on Hyperliquid have maintained sustained long positions in Bitcoin, anticipating a breakout from the current trading range. Over the past two months, these whales have steadily increased their confidence and long positions, re

GateNews1h ago

Willy Woo: Bitcoin Price Action Mirrors Nasdaq, May Need Decade to Gain Recognition as Safe Haven

Gate News message, April 24 — Crypto analyst Willy Woo stated that while most Bitcoin holders view BTC as a safe-haven asset, the reality is more nuanced. Bitcoin does possess safe-haven characteristics—for instance, it enables cross-border asset transfers via seed phrases during wartime and

GateNews1h ago

Strive's SATA Stock Purchases 69 BTC After Hitting $100 Face Value

Gate News message, April 24 — According to ChainCatcher, Strive's SATA stock purchased approximately 69 BTC yesterday (April 23) after reaching a $100 face value. Over the past two days, SATA has accumulated a total of 137 BTC.

GateNews1h ago
Comment
0/400
DestinyGodOfWealthvip
· 2025-10-01 08:22
get liquidated
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-eb47e565vip
· 2025-10-01 08:01
Will he definitely be opening a short?
View OriginalReply0