Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
These days, I've been looking at LST/re-staking again. To put it simply, the main sources of profit are still twofold: one is the "hard work fee" from native staking, and the other is selling security again to other protocols (service fees/incentives). It sounds like a side quest stacking buffs, but the risks also stack: contract issues, penalties and confiscations, liquidity runs, plus an additional layer of "who endorses whom" confusion—if something goes wrong, it’s all in one pot.
By the way, I want to complain about on-chain data tools and tagging systems; sometimes they are really lagging, and can even be misleading by being manipulated to set the rhythm. A few days ago, I impulsively followed a tag called "smart money," but later I found it didn’t match the on-chain transfer rhythm, so I unfollowed it in reverse… I trust the data, but don’t blindly believe in tags. Anyway, what I care more about now is: who is actually paying the returns, who is covering bad debts, and whether the exit channels are smooth.