Honestly, the more I explore new protocols lately, the more I feel that on-chain "privacy" shouldn't be overly optimistic... You may not write your name on your address, but your transaction trail is too easy to trace, especially when you connect to popular routing or transfer funds, it's basically like drawing a roadmap for others. Compliance isn't black and white either; the typical user’s expectations might be twofold: don’t expect privacy to mean no regulation; and don’t interpret compliance as always being at risk of being shut down. It’s more about certain entry/exit points becoming stricter.

By the way, a quick rant about the miner/validator ordering + MEV. Recently, retail investors have been complaining, "Why do I click first but get executed later?" I actually understand. On-chain fairness is more about "rules being transparent," not necessarily "everyone’s experience being fair." I’m not sure if there will be a better ordering mechanism in the future, but my own approach is pretty cautious: split your positions if possible, don’t tie all your operations to one address, take your time if you can, and avoid blindly following the crowd and clicking randomly. That’s how I’m doing it for now.