Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Do you feel like AI Agents are being hyped up now like fully automated workers, but when it actually comes to on-chain actions, someone still needs to cover it… Over the past couple of days, I’ve been watching a few scripts for “automatically doing tasks / automatically farming airdrops,” and the easiest thing to go wrong isn’t the technology—it’s the details: what exactly is being authorized in that signature popup, whether the limits are set too high, whether the contract has been changed under a different label. No matter how smart the Agent is, it’s still hard for it to “be the one who fears death” for you.
Especially now, task platforms are getting harsher about anti-sybil/anti-“witch” measures, and the points system is set up like clocking in at work. The whole one-click multi-account setup that Agents use is, in plain terms, more likely to collide with risk controls. It feels like in the future, AI will be responsible for running the workflow, scanning information, and comparing routes/pathways, while humans handle the final single decisive moment: whether to sign, how much to sign, and how to cut losses if something goes wrong. Anyway, my current habit is: let it draft proposals, and I’ll be the tentacle that does the mine-clearing—tiring, but safer.