Lately, everyone has been talking about the one-stop chain of AI Agents, which is quite exciting but also a bit unsettling. Frankly, if you really let it sign transactions and adjust positions on its own, someone still needs to take responsibility: permissions shouldn't be full, limits need to be set, whitelist addresses/contracts should be reviewed, at least so that you can pause it if something goes wrong. In on-chain interactions, the least "intelligent" part is actually the boundaries: when faced with contract upgrades, parameter changes, or sudden liquidity thinning, the Agent might just blindly follow the strategy and crash into it.

And then there's the trading part... These days, retail investors are again complaining about validator income, MEV, and unfair ordering. No matter how well the Agent calculates, it can't avoid being sandwiched or front-run. What it can do is place orders more cautiously and handle failures better, but decisions like "should I execute" or "can I tolerate this slippage this time" still ultimately need human judgment. Otherwise, losses can quietly accumulate. Anyway, I now prefer to think of it as a high-level alarm clock + executor—use it, but don't hand over full control.