Recently, people keep saying that AI Agents should fully automate on-chain work, and I’m tempted too, but when it comes to execution, someone still needs to take responsibility. For example, signing—basically handing over the keys. No matter how elegant the path calculation is, I only dare to let it do a small test run with 3.7u first; also, authorization limits, whether the contract has been re-skinned, whether there are strange relays in the routing—Agents are good at “completing tasks,” but not necessarily at “keeping safe.” Additionally, lately everyone is watching the unlock calendar daily, shouting about selling pressure, but I’d rather manually check liquidity and slippage again, so the robot doesn’t become the bag-holder when emotions are at their loudest… Anyway, my current principle is: strategies can be handed over to it to run, but the final confirmation step, and the stop-loss switch after something goes wrong, should still be handled by humans. Waiting 20 seconds to take another look can sometimes save a week of emotional recovery.