Recently, looking at DAO proposals feels a bit like flipping through class group announcements: on the surface, it says "for a better ecosystem," but upon closer inspection of the attachments, you find that all the incentives are given to the same group of people, and voting rights are also becoming more concentrated... To put it simply, many proposals are not about doing things, but about rearranging who has the say.

Now I don’t look at the slogans first when reading proposals; I first check "where the money flows and where the votes gather," then see how they package it as "long-termism." By the way, I want to complain that hardware wallets are out of stock, yet there are still a bunch of people clicking on voting links everywhere. During this phishing spike, don’t be too quick—signing is way more risky than the voting results. Anyway, I’d rather be slow and confirm the address more carefully.