"Black Gold Goes Overseas": The Institutional Mismatch in Cross-Border Asset Recovery and the Reallocation of Interests

Roughly 150 million-year-old dinosaur fossils were auctioned off in London, where the gavel fell to complete the sale;

85 sets of London properties, worth more than 60k pounds, were centrally held through more than a dozen shell companies;

More than 60k bitcoins, with a market value of several hundred billion yuan, entered civil asset-recovery proceedings in the High Court after they were seized by UK law enforcement;

Across the Atlantic, meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that it had seized more than 100,000 bitcoins associated with a Cambodian telecom fraud group. The case value is over a thousand billion yuan, setting a record for the largest scale of asset recovery in U.S. history.

These seemingly scattered assets, however, point to the same increasingly clear path: proceeds from economic crimes originating in China, transferred across borders, laundered through layering, and restructured in terms of asset form, ultimately settling in the UK, the U.S., and other mature legal markets. Most of the victims are in China—often scattered and in a weaker position; once the assets abroad are “legitimized” through packaging, the focus of the case is no longer on the upstream crime itself, but instead turns to how overseas judicial systems handle these funds.

We recommend you enter the Caixin database, where you can access macroeconomic data, stocks and bonds, company figures, and other financial information at any time—everything is at your fingertips.