Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Ningxia court mediates virtual currency entrusted investment dispute; the judge indicates that relevant contracts after 2017 may be deemed invalid
ME News message, April 1 (UTC+8). The Yinchuan City, Xingqing District People’s Court in Ningxia has recently concluded a civil and commercial dispute arising from an entrusted investment in a virtual currency. In the case, the plaintiff entrusted the defendant with funds for virtual currency investment. After the plaintiff’s request for the return of the investment principal was not fulfilled, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in court on the grounds of “unjust enrichment.” After reviewing the matter, the presiding judge determined that the actual relationship in this case is one of an entrustment contract, and clarified to both parties the litigation risks and the legal pros and cons. Ultimately, this led the plaintiff to withdraw the lawsuit against some of the defendants, with the remaining defendant returning the investment principal, and the case was successfully resolved through mediation. At the same time, the judge reminded that, according to the judicial opinions of the Supreme People’s Court, an entrusted investment contract signed after the Risk Announcement on Virtual Currencies was issued by the People’s Bank of China and seven other departments on September 4, 2017, would be deemed invalid because the agency matters are unlawful. Investors should carefully assess the related legal risks. (Source: Foresight News)