Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
OpenAI rolls out smaller models to step up its push for intelligent agents, quietly launching a “price war” with domestic models
In the age of agents, the industry is no longer chasing flagship models with ever-larger parameters; instead, it is rolling out more, faster, and more efficient small models. On March 18 Beijing time, OpenAI announced the release of two small models, GPT-5.4 mini and nano. The company says these are its internally “most capable small models to date.” Their capabilities are close to the flagship model GPT-5.4, but they have been optimized for high-frequency workloads, aiming to provide new options for agent-era applications with lower latency and higher cost-performance. Industry analysis believes this is a key step for OpenAI to fill in the missing pieces of its product puzzle for the agent era. After AI moves into real business, not every step needs to “use a sledgehammer to crack a nut.” These small models are precisely intended for the execution layer, serving as the main power for sub-agents. However, when it comes to pure cost-performance, this battlefield has long been shrouded in gun smoke—especially with China’s leading models holding a dominant position. Overseas, some developers have said that GPT-5.4 mini “failed upon release,” because China’s Kimi-K2.5 model is not only priced lower, but also performs better. Still, others believe the reference value of benchmark tests is declining, and the real winner must be verified in real-world tasks. (First Financial)