When detectives encounter narratives, who is telling the story and who is presenting the evidence?

The fermentation of the Axiom incident is essentially a confrontation between storytelling and data. ZachXBT speaks through on-chain traces, while the market votes with prices.
Project teams usually emphasize vision, roadmaps, and ecosystem expansion; on-chain detectives focus on address associations and historical records. When conflicts arise between the two, investors tend to trust "verifiable data."
From an industry perspective, this exposure is a necessary check and balance. The crypto market is decentralized, but information asymmetry still exists. Roles like Zach are actually reducing the information gap.
Of course, it’s also important to view this rationally. Exposure is not a verdict, and on-chain analysis also requires full context. The market’s biggest fear is emotions leading facts, with facts lagging behind.
To sum up: Bull markets rely on stories, bear markets rely on evidence. Projects that can withstand dual scrutiny are truly long-term assets#ZachXBT曝光Axiom事件