Marilyn vos Savant and the Monty Hall problem: How intuition can be wrong compared to mathematics

The story from September 1990 shows how a brilliant mind can challenge popular opinion. Marilyn vos Savant, recognized as the person with the highest IQ in history, published an answer to a probabilistic paradox that still fascinates not only mathematicians but also ordinary puzzle enthusiasts. Her stance caused a storm among scientists, who initially believed she was wrong.

The puzzle that changes the way we think about probability

The Monty Hall problem is inspired by the popular game show “Let’s Make a Deal.” The scenario is deceptively simple: three doors are presented to the contestant. Behind one door is a car—the main prize. Behind the other two are goats. After the contestant makes a choice, the host, who knows exactly where the prize is, opens one of the remaining doors, revealing a goat. At this point, the contestant faces a decision: stick with their initial choice or switch to the other unopened door.

The question seems trivial: what are the actual chances of winning in both scenarios?

Marilyn vos Savant’s answer that forced scientists to reanalyze

In her column in Parade magazine, Marilyn vos Savant gave an answer that sounded heretical to many mathematicians: “Switch doors.” Her reasoning was straightforward—changing doors increases the chances of winning the car from one-third to two-thirds.

The reaction was immediate and overwhelming. Marilyn received over ten thousand letters, including nearly a thousand from people with PhDs. About ninety percent of respondents claimed she was wrong. The criticism was ruthless:

• “You completely misunderstand the fundamentals of probability theory.”
• “This is the biggest mistake I’ve ever seen in science.”
• “Maybe women have difficulty with math?”

The last comment, tinged with sexism, was particularly painful, but Marilyn vos Savant did not back down.

Mathematical explanation: Why switching doors really increases your chances

Analyzing the problem requires understanding conditional probability—a concept that doesn’t come naturally to the mind.

Initial odds: When the contestant makes the first choice, the probability that they picked the car is one in three. The chance that the car is behind one of the other two doors is two in three. This ratio is fundamental.

The host’s knowledge: What the host does is crucial. He always opens a door with a goat behind it—knowing exactly where the car is. This informational element changes the entire situation.

If the contestant initially chose a goat (which has a two-in-three chance), the host is forced to open one of the remaining goat doors. Switching guarantees winning the car.

If the initial choice was the car (one-in-three chance), switching results in losing.

The logic is irrefutable: by switching, the contestant wins in two out of three scenarios—precisely as Marilyn vos Savant stated.

Scientific validation: How computer simulations confirmed the correctness

Scientists from MIT and other institutions decided to verify Marilyn vos Savant’s claims through computer simulations. They ran thousands, then millions, of trials. The results were unequivocal: the success rate of the switching strategy was exactly two-thirds, as predicted.

The popular TV show MythBusters also conducted an experiment with real participants and doors. The results again confirmed the correctness of Marilyn vos Savant’s logic.

Scientists who quickly condemned her had to admit their mistake. Apologies came slowly but steadily. This became a symbolic acknowledgment—not only of her mathematical reasoning but also of her courage in facing widespread criticism.

The psychology of error: Why this problem is intriguing to the mind

Humans tend to make faulty inferences in this problem. After the host opens a door, the participant subconsciously resets the situation mentally, thinking that now the odds are equal—fifty-fifty. This is still an intuitive approach, not a probabilistic one.

Another mechanism is the so-called anchoring bias. The initial choice remains in the mind as “my choice,” and switching seems psychologically risky, even though mathematically justified.

A third factor is the illusion of simplicity. Three doors is a manageable number for our minds, which masks the actual complexity of the probability involved in the task.

Marilyn vos Savant: The genius who did not shy away from criticism

Marilyn vos Savant was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records with an IQ of 228—a number that defines an intellectual extreme. From childhood, she demonstrated extraordinary abilities: at age ten, she read all twenty-four volumes of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, memorizing their contents.

Her path was not easy. Despite her genius, she faced financial difficulties in her youth. She dropped out of college to support her family financially. Her intelligence later found expression in her famous column Ask Marilyn, where she tackled puzzles of logic, mathematics, and science, gaining both admirers and critics.

The Monty Hall problem became a defining moment in her career. It showed that genius is not just about knowledge but also about the ability to stand firm in the face of relentless criticism.

Lesson in logic and courage

Marilyn vos Savant’s story is a reminder of the gap between intuition and mathematical reality. Despite mockery and widespread skepticism, she remained true to her reasoning, ultimately showing that millions of people, including scientists, relied on intuition rather than verifying the math.

Her contribution to probability theory and the popularization of scientific thinking remains enduring. It demonstrates that logic can prevail over public opinion—even when everyone seems to be against you.