2026-01-20 08:33:35

The current operational approach of BSC is quite intriguing: ecosystem projects operate independently, and only those that break through the encirclement will receive subsequent support. On the surface, the logic seems sound, but in practice, there are two unavoidable issues—both whales and retail investors are watching cautiously, and no one dares to go all-in easily, fearing they might be eliminated if there is no official follow-up support. The reality is quite stark: without clear official signals of goodwill and sustained support policies, the entire ecosystem falls into a downward spiral. A more pessimistic prediction is that if this attitude persists, we may see many projects ultimately ignored. This deadlock is not conducive to the long-term development of the entire ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropChaser

· 01-20 09:03

Basically, BSC is playing psychological games—whoever goes all-in first will die. The official "Survivor Game" rules have caused panic among the community, but instead, they have killed the ecosystem. Rather than waiting to be supported, it's better to save ourselves. This kind of wait-and-see attitude is really disgusting; everyone is betting on whether the officials will favor them. The BSC ecosystem is now like a deadlock; no one dares to make the first move. People with money and foolish enough are being discouraged by this logic... If this pace continues, it will truly become a second-tier public chain. Ecosystem self-rescue and official support should go hand in hand, but now they are actually hindering each other. That's the most ironic part.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-20 09:02

It should be pointed out that this "survival of the fittest" game theory was already disproved by Vitalik in the Ethereum white paper back in 2015—the idea that hesitation under information asymmetry is a collective rationality trap, and not a matter of natural selection. On-chain data shows that BSC is now a deadlock: without official endorsement, no one dares to touch it; with official endorsement, it simply indicates that the project itself lacks competitiveness. This logical flaw is so big that you could drive a truck through it. Let me tell you, Satoshi Nakamoto designed PoW to break this deadlock of "central authority deciding life or death"—but instead, BSC has actually strangled decentralization to death. It's so ironic it makes you want to cry. Rather than waiting for official goodwill, it's better to see who dares to be the first to go all-in and break this stalemate... but obviously, no one wants to be the last to be cut as a leek.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingersFOMO

· 01-20 09:01

Basically, the logic of BSC is just a gambler's mentality—whoever goes all-in first is the fool.

View OriginalReply0

SorryRugPulled

· 01-20 08:55

Basically, right now it's all about testing each other; no one wants to be the first to be the big sucker. Without a backbone in the ecosystem, that's how it is. Project teams can't afford to gamble on official attitudes, and retail investors can't afford to either. In the end, everyone is just watching the show, waiting for some official hint. If this continues, it will indeed slowly die.

View OriginalReply0