This project has several noteworthy features. The most core aspect is its deflationary model—each transaction incurs a 3% fee from both buyers and sellers, and all these fees are used for automatic buybacks and burns. The mechanism is fully automated on the blockchain with no human intervention. As circulating tokens are continuously burned, scarcity will become increasingly prominent, and a long-term situation where one coin is hard to obtain is foreseeable.



On the governance level, the entire system operates in a truly decentralized manner, not relying on any centralized entity. From the distribution of token holders, early participants are relatively dispersed, with no obvious large-scale monopolies. This healthy structure can reduce risks.

The project has gathered a group of consensus participants who are working together to promote development. The logic here is straightforward—there's no power for the project team to exploit users; no one can exploit others unless they self-destruct. This transparency is indeed an advantage compared to many other projects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ContractFreelancervip
· 2h ago
6% fee is directly burned. I've seen quite a few of these deflationary mechanisms, but the key still depends on how long the community can sustain.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomicsvip
· 18h ago
honestly, the math on this deflationary mechanism doesn't really hold up under regression analysis. 3% dual-sided burns sound nice on the whitepaper, but have they actually modeled token velocity post-scarcity? most people just handwave the economics here.
Reply0
FantasyGuardianvip
· 01-07 21:52
Deflationary automatic burning sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be another scam coin. I'll wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHolevip
· 01-07 21:47
The deflationary model sounds good, but I'm worried it might be just another scam.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRektvip
· 01-07 21:44
Deflation + decentralization, it sounds pretty good, but the problem is that projects like this always say the same thing at the beginning. Who can be cut? Hehe, let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperervip
· 01-07 21:33
The deflationary model sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be empty talk. Let's wait until it actually goes live before making any judgments.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 01-07 21:33
The deflationary model sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another gimmick. Will the 3% fee actually be burned automatically, or will it end up in a certain address in the end?
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictimvip
· 01-07 21:30
The deflationary model sounds good, but I just want to know, is it really impossible for anyone to profit?
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen'tvip
· 01-07 21:22
The deflationary model sounds good, but I'm worried it might turn into another "one coin hard to find" air coin story.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)