If you imagine Bitcoin as a heavily guarded yet isolated mine, then an oracle is like a newly laid high-speed highway connecting this mine to the external modern financial world.



When this highway was just being built in early 2025, skepticism was overwhelming. People mocked the idea as absurd—like installing a heart in a stubborn stone. But by the end of the year, those once steadfast believers who claimed Bitcoin should be kept cold and offline are now lining up to store assets through lending protocols supported by oracles.

This shift is not a coincidence but a result of technological prowess making cognition bow.

The most intense opposition back then was actually quite unified: Bitcoin doesn’t need oracles. They believed that introducing any external data would undermine the security foundation of the隔离见证 (Segregated Witness).

What is the reality? As Bitcoin’s second-layer networks and inscription ecosystems begin to explode in growth, the market sees a clear truth—without precise, high-frequency, decentralized pricing mechanisms, DeFi within the Bitcoin ecosystem is like racing at a traffic intersection without traffic lights; sooner or later, accidents will happen.

The emergence of oracles essentially equips Bitcoin with a sophisticated digital clock system.

From a technical framework perspective, this isn’t just a simple copy of Ethereum’s oracle system. It’s more like a multi-dimensional verification digital council. It adopts a unique dual consensus mechanism—off-chain, decentralized node groups perform millisecond-level quote aggregation, while on the Bitcoin script layer, verifiable logical anchoring is implemented. This ensures that the entire data feeding process is traceable and verifiable.

When you execute a transaction in any oracle-based DeFi protocol, behind it is this multi-layer verification mechanism operating, ensuring each price signal has been confirmed by enough independent nodes, and any attempt at single-point cheating can be detected.

Market reactions show that the lending scale within the Bitcoin ecosystem has tripled over the past few months. This is not just numerical growth but also reflects a shift in confidence in this infrastructure across the entire ecosystem. Those who once resisted the most are now the most active users, not because they changed their beliefs, but because technology has spoken with facts.
BTC1.51%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainRetirementHomevip
· 20h ago
Haha, really. The hardcore group back then is now eating the worst crow. I should have never hyped the "Bitcoin purity theory." Now it's all gathering dust. The dual consensus oracle system is indeed powerful, more reliable than I thought. Lending has tripled; these numbers don't lie. It seems that technology is the best tool for persuasion.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911vip
· 20h ago
To be honest, I also thought the idea of this oracle was a bit far-fetched at first, but now I've been proven wrong. The fact that the lending scale has tripled is undeniable. The group that was still shouting "Bitcoin purity theory" yesterday is now lining up to use oracles, which is a bit ironic. Layer 2 and inscriptions definitely need this kind of technology; otherwise, DeFi would be in a state of disorder. Technical robustness really speaks the loudest.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivorvip
· 20h ago
Oh, those purest advocates who were mocked back then feel really good now. --- Oracles, to put it simply, are just technology forced by reality to iterate. Nothing mysterious about it. --- Lending tripled? I see it as just a bubble buildup, waiting to burst. --- Those who once opposed are now lining up to use it. This is what they call the "delicious smell" law. --- Not all oracles can be trusted; it mainly depends on the node distribution. This article didn't explain it clearly. --- The dual consensus mechanism sounds good, but whether it's truly safe in practice still needs observation. --- The analogy of mining with high-speed channels is good, but it overlooks a problem—the channel itself might become a new risk point. --- Alright, I admit defeat. Technology is indeed speaking now. My previous opposition seemed a bit foolish. --- Cold storage believers collectively surrender. This is just the beginning of a new round of "cutting leeks." --- I'm actually quite optimistic about the Bitcoin DeFi track. Oracles are indeed a key infrastructure.
View OriginalReply0
CrashHotlinevip
· 20h ago
Face-slapping moment, those who shouted "Bitcoin doesn't need oracles at all"—how are they doing now?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedomvip
· 20h ago
Now I finally understand. Those who once shouted "Bitcoin should just stay flat," why are they all lining up to borrow now? Talk about a slap in the face.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0vip
· 20h ago
Really, the faces of those hardcore Bitcoin believers were slapped hard by reality.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)