I've been saying all along that BNB, SOL, and AAVE are the most worthwhile long-term assets in the crypto space for retirement holdings.
First, let's talk about BNB. No need for much introduction—those in the know are well aware. After purchasing, just hold and stake on the platform to continuously receive airdrops. The more BNB you hold, the greater the value of the airdrops. During active market periods, you can grab three or four airdrops per month, which are real additional income.
The key is that BNB's fundamentals are extremely solid. It is a mainstream coin on the same level as BTC and ETH, with a bright future that requires no worry. When it reaches five digits per coin, it will just be a matter of time. So holding BNB means triple benefits: interest + diverse airdrops + coin price appreciation. Calling it the king of compound interest is no exaggeration.
Next, look at SOL. SOL's design logic is similar to ETH, both moving mining systems onto the chain. The difference is—ETH's validation threshold starts at 32 coins, while SOL has no such limit; you can participate with just one coin, or even 1000 coins. This low barrier to entry attracts many small and medium holders to join the ecosystem.
SOL and BNB have some overlaps. If you're extremely risk-averse, holding both with a bit of diversification is good. But if you want steady progress, you need to choose one. I personally lean towards BNB, as its ecosystem is more mature and airdrop frequency is higher.
Finally, AAVE. The story of this project is the most interesting.
AAVE originally had a lending pool mechanism: users collateralize AAVE to the platform to earn interest. Later, some internal changes occurred, and the founder made a major decision—to transfer full ownership of the project to community governance. At that time, I said this was a big positive. Short-term fluctuations during the transition are inevitable, but once stabilized, AAVE becomes a truly valuable asset.
Currently, the governance rights of AAVE are distributed as follows: holding 100-300 coins grants you community voting power and participation in proposals. Holding over 1000 coins allows involvement in major decisions. Major holders with over 10,000 coins must be consulted before any significant changes are made.
An essential change to understand here is this: in the past, AAVE was like a traditional bank—founders managed it, holders were depositors, and borrowers were clients. Now? The bank remains the same, but the management layer is gone. Every holder has become an actual shareholder of AAVE.
Previously, the profits AAVE earned were mostly taken by the founders, with some interest distributed to holders. Now, every penny AAVE earns is proportionally shared among holders. This is a qualitative shift from passive income to active distribution rights.
So my conclusion is: if you want a reliable long-term asset in the crypto space, these three coins each have their own characteristics but are all worth holding. Earning just from market yields can cover living expenses and participate in market growth—that's the true long-term strategy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RumbleValidator
· 4h ago
SOL's validation threshold is indeed lower than ETH's, but that is precisely a hidden risk. Is node stability guaranteed?
BNB airdrops are indeed frequent, but relying solely on airdrops to make a living is still too optimistic.
AAVE's decentralized governance sounds great, but can the actual operation and maintenance keep up? That's the key.
Holding all three is not as good as investing the money in validation nodes; in the long run, the returns are more stable.
Forget it, let's wait for the data to come out before making any decisions.
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperer
· 01-03 08:51
Triple returns sound good, but can BNB still rise to five figures? Wake up
SOL's low threshold is indeed attractive, just worried it might crash again
I like AAVE's decentralization, but governance tokens often end up as worthless air
Allocating a bit is okay, but those who go all-in for retirement are gamblers, don't fool yourself
These projects are fine, just don't expect a monthly subsidy to cover living expenses; reality isn't that rosy
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-03 08:50
Sounds good, but I still think the BNB airdrop has been exaggerated, and the actual benefits are not as glamorous as the promotion...
I support the AAVE governance rights; decentralization is indeed the future direction, but the threshold is a bit high—10,000 tokens? Ordinary people can't afford to play.
I'm optimistic about SOL; low entry barriers are indeed very attractive, but I'm worried about another crash event...
Retirement assets are fine, but the premise is that the crypto market must continue to survive—this is the real risk, right?
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglasses
· 01-03 08:40
Sounds good, but I still think you need to manage the risks yourself.
---
The recent decentralization of AAVE is indeed interesting, but the real money will only be made once the ecosystem is established.
---
BNB airdrops three or four times a month? What are you talking about, I haven't seen that in half a year.
---
I agree that SOL has low barriers to entry, but its ecosystem stability is really far behind BNB.
---
The term "retirement assets" might be a bit exaggerated; when has the crypto world ever been stable?
---
I understand the logic of AAVE going from treasury to shareholders thoroughly, but it depends on whether the subsequent governance will be a letdown.
---
Five-figure BNB? Dream on, the liquidity alone is challenging enough.
---
Equipping all three with some points is indeed more balanced, but only if you really have that principal.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461
· 01-03 08:31
Honestly, I already jumped on the BNB train a long time ago, now just waiting to receive the airdrop.
The community governance logic of AAVE this time really impresses me, essentially distributing the bank’s profits directly to shareholders. This is what Web3 should look like.
While the low threshold of SOL is an advantage, it also means risk diversification. Still, I feel more comfortable with BNB.
Earning enough to cover living expenses in just a month? That’s true passive income, way more attractive than working a job.
But to be fair, this kind of retirement strategy requires capital. It’s not realistic for small retail investors to just put a few tens of thousands of BNB.
The governance structure of AAVE is interesting, but it feels like they’re treating retail investors as cash cows. Do they really have a say?
A few days ago, I saw someone say that the on-chain activity of the SOL ecosystem has surpassed BNB. What do you think about that?
If you want to hold all three, how much capital would you need to feel comfortable? Seems like you should focus on the key ones.
As ownership rights become more dispersed, will AAVE’s governance efficiency actually decline?
The airdrop thing is being overly optimistic; the real situation probably isn’t that frequent.
I've been saying all along that BNB, SOL, and AAVE are the most worthwhile long-term assets in the crypto space for retirement holdings.
First, let's talk about BNB. No need for much introduction—those in the know are well aware. After purchasing, just hold and stake on the platform to continuously receive airdrops. The more BNB you hold, the greater the value of the airdrops. During active market periods, you can grab three or four airdrops per month, which are real additional income.
The key is that BNB's fundamentals are extremely solid. It is a mainstream coin on the same level as BTC and ETH, with a bright future that requires no worry. When it reaches five digits per coin, it will just be a matter of time. So holding BNB means triple benefits: interest + diverse airdrops + coin price appreciation. Calling it the king of compound interest is no exaggeration.
Next, look at SOL. SOL's design logic is similar to ETH, both moving mining systems onto the chain. The difference is—ETH's validation threshold starts at 32 coins, while SOL has no such limit; you can participate with just one coin, or even 1000 coins. This low barrier to entry attracts many small and medium holders to join the ecosystem.
SOL and BNB have some overlaps. If you're extremely risk-averse, holding both with a bit of diversification is good. But if you want steady progress, you need to choose one. I personally lean towards BNB, as its ecosystem is more mature and airdrop frequency is higher.
Finally, AAVE. The story of this project is the most interesting.
AAVE originally had a lending pool mechanism: users collateralize AAVE to the platform to earn interest. Later, some internal changes occurred, and the founder made a major decision—to transfer full ownership of the project to community governance. At that time, I said this was a big positive. Short-term fluctuations during the transition are inevitable, but once stabilized, AAVE becomes a truly valuable asset.
Currently, the governance rights of AAVE are distributed as follows: holding 100-300 coins grants you community voting power and participation in proposals. Holding over 1000 coins allows involvement in major decisions. Major holders with over 10,000 coins must be consulted before any significant changes are made.
An essential change to understand here is this: in the past, AAVE was like a traditional bank—founders managed it, holders were depositors, and borrowers were clients. Now? The bank remains the same, but the management layer is gone. Every holder has become an actual shareholder of AAVE.
Previously, the profits AAVE earned were mostly taken by the founders, with some interest distributed to holders. Now, every penny AAVE earns is proportionally shared among holders. This is a qualitative shift from passive income to active distribution rights.
So my conclusion is: if you want a reliable long-term asset in the crypto space, these three coins each have their own characteristics but are all worth holding. Earning just from market yields can cover living expenses and participate in market growth—that's the true long-term strategy.