【Crypto World】Helium founder Amir recently shared an interesting observation on social media: the market doesn’t seem to react much to project buyback tokens. Since spending money doesn’t seem to have any effect, rather than continue pouring funds into this bottomless pit, it’s better to use the capital more effectively.
Data also suggests that strategic adjustments are warranted. In October last year, Helium’s mobile business segment generated $3.4 million in revenue. The founder’s logic is clear—rather than doing things the market can’t buy, it’s better to accelerate the expansion of the already successful core business.
This shift reflects the practical considerations of many Web3 projects: tokenomics is important, but actual business growth and user acquisition are the true sources of long-term value. Helium’s move, to some extent, is about adjusting priorities—from “maintaining token price” to “growing the business.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OfflineValidator
· 5h ago
Buybacks can easily become self-congratulatory, but the market simply doesn't buy it.
Real industry is the way to go; here’s the $3.4 million mobile business revenue right in front of us.
Wait, what is Helium currently relying on to make money? Let’s take a closer look.
That's right, token economics is just a facade; in the end, it's all about the robustness of the business.
Another smart person... unfortunately, there are too few like this.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 20h ago
Honestly, buybacks have been out of fashion for a long time, and the market doesn't buy it at all. Helium's shift to mobile business this time is quite smart; with $3.4 million in revenue sitting there, rather than messing around with token prices, it's better to invest the money in genuinely profitable areas.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 20h ago
Oh no, I should have invested the buyback funds into mobile business earlier. Now I’m full of regret...
---
If I had realized sooner that burning money for buybacks is a trap, I might be able to join in the profits now.
---
That's right, token prices really can't be driven by hype alone; it still depends on real revenue. The fact that 3.4 million can be generated shows true strength.
---
But on the other hand, many projects have wanted to do the same thing for a long time, they just can't bear to cut losses...
---
Amir has finally figured it out this time, much more clear-headed than most founders.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watcher
· 20h ago
Someone finally said it: buybacks can't really save the price, it's better to focus on real business. I support Helium's move.
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happen
· 21h ago
Speaking of buybacks, it's indeed a false proposition; the market simply doesn't buy into it.
In fact, rather than spending money to maintain the token price, it's better to focus on the core business itself, with $3.4 million in mobile revenue sitting there.
Finally, some projects have realized that not all problems can be solved with tokenomics.
View OriginalReply0
MEVvictim
· 21h ago
Buybacks are useless; it's better to focus on real business. At least someone finally said it. The crypto space has too many projects just hyping concepts. Helium, at least, has a mobile revenue of over 3.4 million USD to support it, which is much stronger than those relying solely on stories.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSeller
· 21h ago
Buybacks are useless, now they are being honest. Stacking token economics is not as good as focusing on actual products; Helium has finally had a realization.
---
$3.4 million in mobile revenue? Now that's real money, no wonder they are no longer wasting money on tickets.
---
What sounds like adjusting priorities is actually admitting that buybacks are useless... The market is the most honest.
---
I just want to ask, how many projects are still stubbornly doing buybacks? You should really take a look at Helium's clarity.
---
Once the mobile business is up and running, it's time to go all in. Don't always think about using token prices to prolong life; that logic makes sense.
---
Finally, a founder dares to tell the truth. Token economics? It should have gone out of fashion long ago; users and revenue are the real keys.
---
The logic is clear, but this isn't very friendly to token holders... But on the other hand, if the business is good, the token will naturally rise.
Helium founder announces stopping token buybacks to focus on expanding mobile business — what is the underlying logic?
【Crypto World】Helium founder Amir recently shared an interesting observation on social media: the market doesn’t seem to react much to project buyback tokens. Since spending money doesn’t seem to have any effect, rather than continue pouring funds into this bottomless pit, it’s better to use the capital more effectively.
Data also suggests that strategic adjustments are warranted. In October last year, Helium’s mobile business segment generated $3.4 million in revenue. The founder’s logic is clear—rather than doing things the market can’t buy, it’s better to accelerate the expansion of the already successful core business.
This shift reflects the practical considerations of many Web3 projects: tokenomics is important, but actual business growth and user acquisition are the true sources of long-term value. Helium’s move, to some extent, is about adjusting priorities—from “maintaining token price” to “growing the business.”