2026-01-03 07:28:16

I have reviewed the key metrics of this project, and there are several points worth noting:

**Fundamental Data**
The project adopts a zero-inflation design, with 100% of the token supply currently in circulation. Last year, it generated $4.8 million in revenue, a 28% increase year-over-year. This revenue is not retained by the development team but is fully redistributed to stakers and node operators. Currently, 20% of the total supply is staked.

**Market Observation**
From the long-term chart, the project is operating at a key support level. This model, where all earnings are distributed to participants, remains somewhat attractive in the current market environment. Zero inflation means no ongoing selling pressure, and combined with a high distribution ratio, it forms the basic investment logic of the project.

The 20% staking rate indicates room for increased participation, and potential growth expectations are worth monitoring.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 2h ago

Zero inflation + full distribution of earnings, this logic really has some substance The staking rate is only 20%, if it rises to 50%, it will be a game-changer The 100% circulating supply is a bit tight, there might be no more room for growth later 4.8 million in earnings with a 28% increase, stable is stable, but the growth rate isn't aggressive enough The support level needs to be re-evaluated, don't let another spike happen The real test is whether participation can continue to increase, otherwise it’s just a dividend machine

View OriginalReply0

FUDwatcher

· 20h ago

Zero inflation plus full rewards go entirely to stakers. This logic is indeed refreshing and much better than some project teams taking the lion's share.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMom

· 21h ago

Zero inflation is truly absolute; no feeling of team rug pulls. --- 4.8 million in earnings fully distributed to stakers, I buy into this logic. --- Staking rate is only 20%? Seems like it can go higher. If next year this data doubles, it would be terrifying. --- Support levels depend on the chart, but fully distributing earnings is definitely more conscientious than those projects that only enrich themselves. --- Wait, if 100% is in circulation, is there still room for future inflation? Or is it really zero inflation? --- 28% year-over-year growth isn't very high. We need to see if it's just a rebound in a bear market. --- 20% staking, 80% still outside. Doesn't that mean there's significant selling pressure? --- Honestly, I've seen many models like this. The key is whether trading volume and real users are present; good data doesn't always translate to good usability. --- The earnings model is good, but how can we ensure that node operators won't collude to dump? --- Support levels need to truly hold to be meaningful. Anything else is just talk.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 21h ago

Zero inflation + full distribution of earnings, this logic really has some substance Staking rate is only 20%, how many people are still on the sidelines Can the support level hold? That's the key $4.8 million growth isn't fast, let's take another look The earnings distribution model is good, but can the selling pressure really be controlled?

View OriginalReply0