KaitoAI's leaderboard recently introduced a new rule, and I heard they're setting thresholds for all rankings. Honestly, I think this approach makes sense—after all, it's important to distinguish those who truly contribute.

How are the new rules divided? It's a simple two-choice system:

The first way is based on reputation. What is reputation? Basically, it's about consistently providing valuable content. I understand this; those who can reliably produce value should indeed have a say.

The second way is directly on-chain. Does the wallet hold real assets? Has there been actual interaction with projects? All of this is recorded on the blockchain and cannot be changed. From a certain perspective, this is more honest.

But here's the problem—will this approach block a large number of people? Newcomers, those without content accumulation, or those still observing—suddenly, they have no chance to make the list. Is this progress or does it turn into an elite circle? I'm a bit unsure. The product logic becomes more rigorous, but will community inclusiveness actually decrease?