Late at night, I was awakened by a message: a major mainstream DEX burned 100 million governance tokens, an asset valued at nearly $600 million. As an observer who has been navigating the Web3 market for years, my first reaction was not excitement but "there must be a story behind this." In this circle, the most common tactic is "burn marketing"—some projects casually burn tokens to create a scarcity illusion and drive up prices. But after spending half an hour reviewing related announcements and on-chain data, I realized this time is completely different.



Remember the trivial attributes of early governance tokens? Nominally "governance rights," but in reality? Besides being able to click "like" on voting pages, holders hardly receive any protocol revenue. The platform makes huge profits, while token holders can only watch and hope—this contradiction of "centralized profit, decentralized dividends" has left many people deeply disappointed in such tokens.

The permanent destruction of 100 million tokens makes logical sense: first, it directly cuts off ongoing selling pressure, alleviating inflation issues; second, it sends a clear signal to the market—we are changing the game rules. From "hollow governance" to "real value feedback," this is not just a numbers game but a shift in the fundamental thinking of DeFi infrastructure.

The most critical follow-up action is the promotion of the fee activation mechanism. Once protocol revenue truly starts flowing to token holders, this once "lacking in popularity" ecosystem asset can demonstrate real value support. That’s why I believe this step is not just a project team’s self-rescue but a wake-up call for the entire DeFi track.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleTreeHuggervip
· 4h ago
Burning 600 million dollars worth of tokens in the middle of the night, honestly, it's just to prove that they're different, but I only believe it if they actually get the money.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 4h ago
To be honest, I've seen too many coin burn schemes, but this time it's really a bit different... The key still depends on whether the fee distribution mechanism is implemented; otherwise, it's just another prelude to cutting the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 4h ago
Honestly, I really can't see through this operation... Burning $600 million worth of stuff, anyone can just say nice words. Let's wait until the fee mechanism goes live, for now it's just a story.
View OriginalReply0
FrontRunFightervip
· 4h ago
nah hold up, the fee mechanism activation is the real tell here. everything else is just theater if they don't actually route revenue back. seen this playbook too many times—burn tokens, pump hype, then radio silence on actual tokenomics.
Reply0
HappyToBeDumpedvip
· 4h ago
A sudden twist of destruction coming out of nowhere, this time it's a bit different.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)