I received a message early in the morning: a leading DEX platform burned 100 million governance tokens in one go, which at the time’s price was close to $600 million USD in volume. My first reaction wasn’t amazement at the scale of funds but rather a sense of an unusual signal.



Having been involved in the crypto space for many years, I’ve seen too many cases where "burning" becomes just a marketing gimmick. But this time feels different. After spending time reviewing the platform’s past updates and mechanism designs, I realized: this is far beyond a simple token burn; it’s a deep adjustment of the entire DeFi ecosystem.

To put it more clearly, in the past, such governance tokens were somewhat dispensable. Pure voting rights, where token holders can vote, but the platform’s trading fee revenue has nothing to do with them. Essentially, it’s like standing next to a gold mine but only occasionally picking up some scraps. The permanent burn of 100 million tokens is actually a way to pay back the "oversupply" in history, fundamentally cutting off the source of token inflation.

The deeper logic is in the following. After the fee switch is activated, part of the protocol’s revenue will automatically buy back this token on-chain and then burn it. From another perspective, it’s like installing a 24-hour "buyer" in a trillion-dollar trading market. The higher the trading activity, the more frequent the buybacks. This mechanism ties the token directly to the platform’s actual income, changing the awkward situation of "only voting without dividends."

For the entire sector, this could mean more platforms will follow suit with similar tokenomics restructuring. Whoever can truly link revenue to the interests of token holders will gain the right to speak in the next round of competition.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeLovervip
· 4h ago
Finally, a platform dares to take real action, and this time it's not just a pretense to harvest retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlertvip
· 4h ago
$600 million burned? This buyback and burn mechanism is really ruthless. Finally, a platform has figured it out.
View OriginalReply0
ChainChefvip
· 4h ago
nah this is the recipe we've been waiting for... finally someone's actually *seasoning* the tokenomics instead of just half-baking another governance token 🍳
Reply0
ResearchChadButBrokevip
· 4h ago
Damn, this is the real gameplay. All those previous destructions were just on paper.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgainvip
· 4h ago
It's hard to buy early knowledge with a thousand gold, yet another "innovative mechanism." I just want to ask, with this buyback and burn system, will it become the next liquidation trap... It sounds nice, but in reality, it still depends on trading volume. If trading volume drops, the mechanism becomes worthless. Does anyone mention the contract risk? 24-hour automatic buyback... what if there's a sudden crash? This logic is indeed better than pure voting, but my heavy loss lessons tell me not to trust on-chain automation too much. The money I used to top up hasn't been recovered yet, and now there's a new "tokenomics" scam trying to fool me. I'm really not brave enough to bottom fish; the liquidation price is always waiting for me.
View OriginalReply0
PuzzledScholarvip
· 4h ago
Alright, finally some platform has figured this out. Those governance tokens were indeed worthless before, but now there's a solid underlying logic. Wait, can this buyback and burn truly hold up, or is it just another marketing stunt? Other DEXs probably can't sit still anymore; they need to quickly follow suit and restructure their token economies. That's right, linking revenue is the key; who really cares about voting rights? That's pretty bold—cutting off the source of inflation directly. The scale is definitely different. But the problem is, what if trading volume drops? The buyback力度 isn't enough. Finally seeing a platform take token holders seriously; before, it was all just scams. Burning $600 million—how much confidence does that take, or is it just betting on a market rebound? It feels like whoever can't keep up with this logic in the next round will be out. Wow, they've really understood token economics now—this isn't just pure marketing?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)