Even as quantitative investing faced headwinds throughout 2025, certain multistrategy funds managed to navigate the turbulence effectively. One notable performer delivered a 19.6% return over the year, signaling a potential shift in how sophisticated trading strategies are weathering current market conditions.



This comeback performance reflects broader patterns in algorithmic and quantitative approaches—demonstrating that despite sector-wide volatility, disciplined multi-pronged strategies can still capture value. The year proved challenging for quant traders across the board, yet selective funds that balanced risk exposure showed resilience.

For portfolio managers and individual investors tracking macro trends, this data point underscores an important lesson: even in choppy markets, diversified strategy frameworks can outperform single-thesis approaches. The ability to adapt across multiple market regimes—whether trending, ranging, or stress scenarios—continues to reward those with the right tactical framework.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StableBoivip
· 3h ago
19.6% return? Sounds good, but I don't know if this fund is really impressive or if survivor bias is at play. Multi-strategy funds are like this; understanding risk diversification allows you to survive much better than all-in on a single strategy. That's common sense. Quantitative trading in 2025 is so challenging that those who can operate steadily are worth paying attention to, but on the other hand, risk control is truly the core. It feels like these kinds of articles just want to say that diversification is very important... but the market isn't that simple. Algorithmic trading that can survive is truly skilled; those just following the trend have already been eliminated. This data is a bit interesting, but you still need to look at the fund's holdings and historical performance. A year's results don't tell you much.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 4h ago
19.6%? Sounds good, but who believes that these days? What about the pullback? --- Multi-strategy funds have indeed held up, but how to judge just by a single number? You need to look at the Sharpe ratio. --- Both quant and algo—basically market makers are just taking advantage of retail investors. Nothing new. --- Wait, are there still long strategies alive in 2025? What about my short positions... --- A 19.6% return is really a rare find in this bear market. --- So the key is risk exposure, not absolute returns, right? This stuff is too easy to fool beginners. --- Diversification frameworks and so on—sounds just like traditional finance preaching the same story. Web3 has already played this game. --- Do these funds usually require lock-up periods? Short-term gains are meaningless.
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffeevip
· 4h ago
A 19.6% return sounds good, but can it really be replicated? --- Multi-strategy funds are starting to show off again, just worried about being proven wrong next year --- Basically, it's just good luck to catch the wind, don't mistake chance for certainty --- Quantitative trading is becoming more and more competitive... --- Balancing risk well can indeed allow for bottom fishing; I’ve learned this approach --- After all, it still relies on diversification strategies to save the day; a single approach is indeed prone to pitfalls --- 19.6% looks tempting, but how many can stick with it until the end of the year? --- Multi-strategy funds are designed for bear markets, no wonder they make money --- Here comes more anxiety marketing... but it’s true that timing is crucial --- Such returns are nothing in a bull market; I still want to see the crazy gains like in 2024
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt