For those holding a major native token of a blockchain, the biggest concern is often not price fluctuations but the income gap after selling.



A few days ago, I did some calculations: the total of various expenses over the past five years is nearly 2 million yuan. This number suddenly made me realize that a significant portion of my daily expenses is actually supported by ecosystem airdrops and liquidity incentives. If it weren’t for this ongoing welfare income, relying solely on yield farming and participating in public fundraising projects, I wouldn’t be able to maintain my current lifestyle.

Last year’s income composition was roughly like this: various incentives within the BNB ecosystem accounted for the majority, then I participated in a well-known project’s public offering, mined some XPL in on-chain finance, and occasionally took advantage of Alpha opportunities. Honestly, besides these, I didn’t have much other investment gains—buying assets like ASP, for example, resulted in quite a few losses. Fortunately, my basic living expenses are covered.

I’ve been a bit lazy and haven’t systematically researched new directions for yield farming in the past three years. But on second thought, although the returns from individual yield farming projects are indeed not as lucrative as in previous years, compared to other passive income methods, this approach still has a higher success rate. This year, I plan to refocus and carefully study those financial and incentive plans within the ecosystem that have actual outputs.

After all, for holders, the compound interest effect of ecosystem yields is the key to long-term growth—this is much more solid than simply speculating on token prices.
BNB2.27%
XPL13.05%
ASP-0.97%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-afe07a92vip
· 6h ago
2 million spent already, that's really ruthless... But on the other hand, relying on airdrops and incentives to make a living is indeed a bit hollow. What if one day the ecosystem declines?
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCriticvip
· 6h ago
Honestly, the 2 million five-year expenditure figure is a bit shocking... But on second thought, it perfectly reflects the reality of our group—being "raised" by ecosystem incentives. Once the flow stops, it’s indeed panic-inducing. The key issue is that the **sustainability indicators** of this model are actually declining. The gains from "harvesting" are decreasing year by year, and I also clearly felt last year that the success rate of individual projects was dropping. The proportion of BNB ecosystem's main share you mentioned is, frankly, still relying on existing red dividends—new projects' incentive density simply can't compare to previous years. However, your last point hits the mark: **the power of compound interest is the key**. But the prerequisite is to find ecosystems with genuine product lifecycle support, not just empty air. There are too many projects on the market that are just "harvesting" users; it’s really a gamble on who can survive the next cycle... Rather than waiting for income to plateau, it’s better now to diversify incentive sources and not put all your eggs in the BNB basket.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSatsvip
· 6h ago
Honestly, it's a bit nerve-wracking. Relying entirely on airdrops to cover 2 million in expenses sounds very fragile.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainGossipervip
· 6h ago
This is the difference between ordinary people and professional players. My 2 million expenditure has long been a futile effort.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)