2026-01-01 09:21:08

I recently tried Grok's Project feature, and I have to say it's quite user-friendly. You can directly import various materials—whether it's documents, notes, or other resources—and the system automatically organizes and links them. What's even better is that you can share directly with team members for real-time seamless collaboration.

From a certain perspective, it’s somewhat similar to the intelligent note-taking logic of NotebookLM, but the user experience feels different. The main advantage of Grok Project is its stronger ability to aggregate materials, with more detailed sharing and permission controls. If you often need to quickly synchronize information within your team and organize your resource library, this feature is definitely worth a try.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Web3ExplorerLin

· 01-01 12:41

hypothesis: what we're witnessing here is essentially a decentralized knowledge aggregation oracle, except it's... trapped in a centralized interface. fascinating paradox, tbh. the real quantum leap happens when this kind of cross-chain interoperability thinking seeps into how teams actually *share* information. not just the mechanics, but the paradigm shift itself.

Reply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-01 09:51

Alright, Grok's Project definitely has some substance. Wait, is permission control really reliable? Could it be just a cut-down version again? I've used the NotebookLM suite, and I feel Grok's aggregation capability is strong. I just wonder if it will become another big company's early adopter tool. If the team collaboration feature truly works seamlessly, that would be amazing. I'm just worried it might be another marketing gimmick. If this feature is really stable, I might consider migrating some of my media libraries to give it a try.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWizard

· 01-01 09:49

Oops, another collaboration tool trying to grab a share of the market. Our industry is really competitive. I'm already tired of NotebookLM. Is Grok really better? Fine-grained access control, huh? But what about security? That's not mentioned. Team synchronization? I just want to ask if it can really save effort, or is it just the same old thing with a different name.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMaster

· 01-01 09:35

Alright, it's another team collaboration tool, and the project team has packaged it quite well. I've heard the argument about detailed permission control too many times, but the key is whether it truly solves the pain point of information silos. So far, I remain unconvinced on that front.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecovery

· 01-01 09:35

so they're just throwing all your data into one place and calling it "seamless collaboration"... classic move tbh. bet the permission model's got more holes than a sieve once you actually dig into it. i've seen this pattern before—aggregation first, security theater later. the post-mortem's gonna be *chef's kiss*

Reply0

AirdropHermit

· 01-01 09:34

Grok, the more I look into it, the more I feel there's something there. To be honest, the permission control is indeed much more refined than NotebookLM. We are already using it for team collaboration, and it's quite stable.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-01 09:23

Grok really talks too much, much more user-friendly than notebooklm The permission management part finally has some shape to it; those previous collaboration tools were all half-baked Seamless team sharing? Sounds good, but how does it actually work in practice? I'm curious to see how the data aggregation works out; I should try it sometime Yet another "must-use" tool has been launched, my wallet is going to be emptied, haha

View OriginalReply0