Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Some people claim that FHE (Fully Homomorphic Encryption) and ZK proofs (Zero-Knowledge Proofs) are the same thing. I want to say: that logic is flawed. According to this reasoning, Zama and Tornado Cash should also be the same? But in reality, although they both involve privacy protection, their technical principles are completely different, and their application scenarios are entirely different. FHE allows direct computation on encrypted data without revealing the data itself, while ZK proofs demonstrate the truth of a statement without exposing the information—these two address fundamentally different problems. Zama is mainly used in privacy computing scenarios, while Tornado Cash is used for mixing and transaction privacy. So, people who confuse these concepts might need to do some extra studying.