2025-12-27 10:21:58

This is getting interesting. No matter from which angle you look at it, those who deny the 4-year cycle are still desperately using historical data to argue that 2026 will continue to soar. Isn't that ironic?

Using data to speak is correct. But cherry-picking data to speak is a bit awkward. While Bitcoin's cycle pattern is not an iron law, completely overturning it requires real skill. Just pointing to the past few years' trends and claiming that the entire next year will be a bull market? That logical flaw is quite significant.

In the crypto world, the drama of history repeating itself and breaking rules plays out one after another. Those who say 2026 will see a big rise need to think clearly—are your arguments really solid?

BTC0.72%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketHustler

· 4h ago

Haha, really, I've seen a lot of cherry-pick data like this. What will 2026 look like? We'll see when the time comes. The cycle theory is like this; when you believe, everything is evidence.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 4h ago

Haha, this is the crypto world—everyone lives in their own narrative. In simple terms, it's all about choosing what data to believe.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 4h ago

Haha, selective blindness in data argumentation, the crypto circle's favorite game. No one can predict exactly what 2026 will look like; it's all a gamble anyway. The cycle theory was dismissed, then suddenly used again to justify a bull market—what a flip. Logical consistency? In the crypto world? Don't make me laugh. Reminded me, every cycle someone swears by it, only to get slapped in the face as the same old story repeats. The data is right there; it all depends on how you interpret it. I only trust my wallet.

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 4h ago

I’ve heard this set of arguments too many times. In 2018, it was the same reasoning, and what was the result? Those who got caught in the pitfalls are all crying for their mothers. Both sides play the data game equally — I did the same back then. Now I’m just a rookie, and you still have the nerve to teach others? Whether it will rise in 2026, honestly, I don’t know. Anyway, the brothers who are going all in now are all in the blood-loss group. --- Stop joking. Does anyone who believes in this cycle theory in the crypto world ever make money? I’ve never seen it. --- This logical flaw... Actually, both sides are completely rotten, just looking for arguments to support their positions. I’ve seen through it. --- Honestly, no matter how fiercely you argue, 2026 won’t rise just because someone is right. That’s just how the market is. --- People who use data to prove their point and those who deny cycles are actually gambling. I just love watching you all bicker.

View OriginalReply0

degenonymous

· 4h ago

Haha, double standards in action. Denying the cycle on one hand while building walls with data on the other—this logic is truly impeccable. Bro who insists it will definitely rise in 2026, you need to reflect carefully. Are your arguments solid enough to withstand scrutiny? The crypto world is like this. Today denying yesterday's patterns, tomorrow coming up with new reasons. It's a bit exhausting.

View OriginalReply0