2025-12-27 06:23:25

There is a DeFi lending project known for its irregular updates—its operational style is considered an outlier in the industry, and whether players are still active is entirely guesswork. However, its true highlight is not in parameter data but in breaking the traditional framework of lending protocols.

Most lending protocols on the market mainly address the efficiency bottleneck of single chains, but this project differentiates itself by reorganizing the operational logic of lending, attempting to break through the ceiling of a single chain. If lending only focuses on on-chain optimization, it will eventually encounter issues like liquidity fragmentation and high cross-chain costs. From this perspective, innovative ideas that change organizational methods are indeed worth paying attention to—this is the next dimension of competition for DeFi protocols.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForeverBuyingDips

· 8h ago

Irregular updates? I'm also amazed by this operational style, feels like they might run away at any time haha Cross-chain liquidity is indeed a pain point, but is this project reliable? I'll wait and see Innovation framework is innovation, but the key is to stay afloat This idea is good, just worried about the execution capability not keeping up

View OriginalReply0

HashBrownies

· 8h ago

Irregular updates to this operation are truly outrageous; relying on guesses for activity levels—who can stand this? Cross-chain liquidity is indeed a pain point; single-chain optimization has long hit a ceiling. This idea is innovative, but the casual approach to operations is really daring. Breaking through the single-chain framework sounds easy to say, but can it really be implemented? I'm a bit interested in how this project plans to solve the cross-chain cost issue.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9ad11037

· 8h ago

Irregular updates? This operational style is indeed amazing. By the way, how is this guy still alive until now? Cross-chain liquidity is indeed a problem, but relying on "guessing" to maintain popularity is also quite exciting. This idea is good, but I don't know if it can really be done. It feels like another PPT innovation. Breaking through the single-chain ceiling sounds cool, but how to actually implement it is still a question. Replaying the lending logic? That's interesting, but how to control the risks? Basically, it's about ideas that others haven't thought of. Worth following and checking out.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 8h ago

Irregular updates and claiming to be innovative? Isn't that just laziness in maintenance? Haha Cross-chain liquidity is indeed a pain point, but can changing the organizational structure alone break the deadlock? I doubt it. I'm cautious about this kind of project; if the operations aren't attentive, why should I bet on it? The idea is good, but the execution is worrying—typical PPT DeFi. Wait, does this guy really have a team, or is it just air operations?

View OriginalReply0

TheMemefather

· 8h ago

Irregular updates? This operational style makes me want to laugh just looking at it, feels like they could go offline at any time. Cross-chain liquidity is indeed a pain point, but I haven't seen many projects daring to change their framework, worth studying. The ceiling issue is correctly pointed out; optimizing a single chain to the end is a dead end. I believe in this approach. These kinds of outlier projects either become a huge hit or fade away, with no middle ground.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 8h ago

Irregular updates? Isn't this just Schrödinger's project? Haha Really daring to play, cross-chain is indeed a pain point, but having such a "unique" operational style and still attracting people is just ridiculous. The idea is interesting, but don't tinker too much or you'll end up becoming the next failure case. Dispersed liquidity is a valid point, but the premise is that it needs to survive, right?

View OriginalReply0