🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
U.S. Regulators Shut Down $14M Crypto Scam Targeting Retail Investors
Source: Coindoo Original Title: U.S. Regulators Shut Down $14M Crypto Scam Original Link: U.S. authorities have uncovered a sophisticated crypto fraud network that relied more on psychology than technology, using online communities and fabricated success stories to extract millions from retail investors.
Federal regulators say the scheme, now the subject of enforcement action by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, revolved around creating a false sense of belonging and expertise rather than offering any genuine exposure to digital assets. In total, more than $14 million was allegedly taken from investors nationwide.
Trust came first, investing came later
Unlike typical scams that push products immediately, this operation focused on slowly building credibility. Victims were initially drawn in through polished social media promotions advertising private investing circles. These communities marketed themselves as educational hubs, claiming to offer insider knowledge, AI-enhanced strategies, and guidance from seasoned professionals.
Only after participants spent time engaging with group discussions did the pitch escalate. Conversations migrated into private messaging apps, where organizers presented themselves as mentors rather than salespeople. Carefully scripted messages and fabricated trading insights were shared daily, creating the impression of an active, high-performing investment group.
A trading environment that never existed
Once confidence was established, members were encouraged to deposit funds onto sleek-looking crypto platforms that appeared legitimate at first glance. According to regulators, these platforms were entirely fictional. No trades were executed, no assets were purchased, and no licenses existed – despite repeated assurances to the contrary.
To further legitimize the operation, scammers introduced fake token offerings tied to made-up companies, framing them as rare early-stage opportunities. Investors believed they were gaining access to exclusive crypto deals, while their funds were quietly redirected elsewhere.
Losses accelerated at the exit
The illusion typically collapsed when participants attempted to cash out. Withdrawal requests were met with new requirements: extra fees, tax payments, or verification charges that supposedly stood between the investor and their profits. None of these payments resulted in returned funds.
Regulators say this final phase was critical to maximizing losses, as victims who had already committed significant sums were pressured to send even more in hopes of recovering earlier deposits. The funds were then routed through foreign accounts and crypto wallets, reducing the chances of recovery.
A familiar playbook with modern tools
The SEC characterized the case as part of a growing wave of “confidence-based” investment frauds, where scammers exploit private messaging apps, social validation, and emerging technologies like artificial intelligence to appear legitimate. Officials warned that the combination of crypto hype and closed-group communication makes these schemes especially dangerous.
Investors were urged to remain skeptical of unsolicited opportunities, particularly those that move discussions off public platforms and into private chats. Regulators emphasized that legitimate investments do not guarantee returns, do not require extra payments to access funds, and do not rely on secrecy to succeed.
The case underscores a broader message from authorities: when trust is manufactured quickly and transparency is missing, the risk of fraud is often far higher than it appears.