The scarcity of chips in this project is truly eye-catching. There are only 500,000 tokens in circulation on the market, and this supply level is extremely valuable in the current crypto market. Just look at how many institutions and seasoned players are quietly positioning themselves, with chips being absorbed wave after wave.



Compared to mainstream major coins, $BNB, $SOL , these have already become consensus assets, and $GIGGLE , while quite popular, still has some gaps in terms of scarcity. What does a small circulating supply mean? It means that once capital flows in, the price potential is right there. It’s not saying it will definitely make you rich, but from the supply side, this logic is indeed worth paying attention to.

The movements of the whales best illustrate the point—they wouldn’t enter the market without reason. The recent chip competition has already begun, and this timing is quite interesting. Of course, risks and opportunities have always been two sides of the same coin.
BNB1.39%
SOL0.42%
GIGGLE3.44%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaservip
· 2025-12-21 17:57
With a circulating supply of 500,000 coins, this number really can't hold up. Once hot money comes into a small market, it can take off, but the premise is that someone really needs to take this market. Whales are quietly accumulating, what does it mean? It simply shows they are eyeing the scarcity, but this kind of trick is getting old. Who knows what the next windfall will be? A small circulating supply = large potential for rise; I won't argue with this logic, but let's not forget that when it falls, it can be just as brutal. Institutional layouts are indeed underway, just be careful not to be played for suckers by these information discrepancies. Scarcity ≠ value; honestly, this might be a bit of an over-interpretation, but small markets are indeed easy to move. When will this chip battle end? It feels like it hasn't even started yet.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorervip
· 2025-12-20 21:27
500,000 tokens sound scarce, but I always feel this kind of rhetoric is a bit cliché... Don't be fooled. Once someone dumps on small-cap tokens, it's over. The risk is much greater than you think. Scarcity ≠ value. There must be practical applications. Relying solely on hype can only last so long. Institutions are making moves? I haven't seen on-chain data to support this claim. Small-cap tokens are a double-edged sword. It's great when they rise, but when they fall, it's a bloodbath. Comparing with BNB and SOL? Don't be ridiculous. They are ecosystems, but what about this one? Honestly, a low supply is indeed attractive, but storytelling and actual trading are two different things. Token battles? Feels more like the whales are just eating up the retail investors. I've heard this kind of argument hundreds of times last year. And what happened in the end? You've all forgotten. I've seen many tokens with small circulating supply, but few have survived in the end.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePuddingvip
· 2025-12-19 14:43
A circulation of 500,000 tokens sounds scarce, but I've heard this argument too many times. Every time, they say that whales are accumulating, but what’s the result... The price has a large potential for growth, but there must be real demand; otherwise, it’s just paper wealth. Limited supply ≠ price increase; this logic is incomplete. Whale movements are indeed worth paying attention to, but don’t use people's FOMO as an investment reason. This round of chip争夺战 is being hyped up, but ultimately, it depends on whether the fundamentals support it.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTradervip
· 2025-12-19 04:50
500,000 tokens in circulation? It does sound a bit substantial, but the story about whales entering the market has been around for so many years, and we still need to see if it can stabilize later on. By the way, when will the hype around GIGGLE cool down? I see someone is already spinning stories about scarcity again. Small caps are easy to pump and dump; it's all about whether the popularity can hold. Chips争夺? First, see who is really absorbing and who is just hyping. I've heard this logic a thousand times... but the key is whether there are people willing to take the bait. 50,000 tokens in circulation is not surprising; the question is whether anyone wants them.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 2025-12-19 04:48
A circulation of 500,000 tokens is indeed scarce, but bro, I've heard this logic too many times... Every time it's about giant whales making moves, and then what? The chip争夺战 sounds impressive, but I'm more concerned about the project's fundamentals—don't just get excited about supply. The reason BNB and SOL have become consensus is because of their ecosystems and applications, so what does GIGGLE have to compete with? Opportunities like this are often the easiest to fall into traps.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 2025-12-19 04:46
A circulation of 500,000 tokens is indeed rare, but bro, you mentioned whales making moves... I haven't seen any obvious large transfers on the chain, or am I behind on the information?
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrowervip
· 2025-12-19 04:30
500,000 circulating tokens? Sounds good, but I’d rather know how many of those 500,000 are locked... what percentage are truly active chips? Whale entry is definitely worth paying attention to, but don’t fall for this narrative routine. Every time they say "institutional layout," but in the end, retail investors are the ones who take the final hit. Scarcity of supply = price increase? I’ve heard this logic too many times. The key still depends on whether there is real application and ecological support. Talking about timing is very passionate, but in reality, no one can precisely hit the mark. Instead of stressing over entry timing, think about how much drawdown you can tolerate. 500,000 vs BNB, SOL, the gap isn’t just about scarcity, the underlying ecosystem and consensus are the real moat. Chip争夺战... I just want to see who will laugh last in this "war." A gambler’s mentality is a no-go.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯vip
· 2025-12-19 04:27
50 million in circulation? Sounds good, but I just can't believe it... Are the whales really quietly entering the market? --- Limited supply ≠ guaranteed increase. BNB was scarce back then too, but that was because it was truly useful. What about this one? --- Talking about chip battles, it feels like just another common tactic to sell anxiety. --- Institutional layout... Which institutions? Can you name them, my friend? --- A small circulating supply can indeed push prices up, but during a decline, the sell-off is fierce too. Have you decided on your target bottom price? --- Talking about risks and opportunities every day as two sides of the same coin—that means there's risk involved. Not exactly groundbreaking. --- Does $GIGGLE have any application scenarios? It feels purely like a speculative play.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)