Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

What is the real revolution in financial infrastructure? The answer might not lie in the loudest concepts, but rather in some quietly emerging real-world applications.



Two things last week made me rethink this question:

A private bank in Hong Kong used a public blockchain focused on financial applications to settle a tokenized private equity fund on-chain—not a demo, but a real operation with actual money.

At the same time, the daily trading volume of the on-chain order book trading platform Hydro has surpassed that of several second-tier centralized exchanges for similar trading pairs for a whole week.

These two scenarios may seem completely unrelated, but they both tell the same story: migration is happening. Not just proof of concept, but the actual transfer of assets, funds, and trading habits.

Why are traditional financial institutions choosing this path? Because it doesn't force you to learn a whole new set of rules. The order book model is already what institutional traders are most familiar with, and the blockchain simply works quietly in the background to improve clearing efficiency and transparency. You don’t need to understand what gas fees or liquidity pools are to complete a trade—sometimes, lowering the psychological barrier is more effective than lowering the technical one.

Everyone is talking about RWA (real-world asset tokenization) these days, but the question has never been "Can assets be put on-chain?" but "How can they actually become liquid once they are on-chain?"

If tokenized stocks can’t find a deep enough trading market, if bond tokens can only entertain themselves in isolated protocols, what’s the point of tokenization? The real test isn’t at the issuance stage, but whether the secondary market liquidity and infrastructure can support it.

That’s also why the rise of order book DEXs is worth watching—it proves that on-chain trading can closely match the user experience of centralized platforms while retaining the core advantages of decentralization. When institutions no longer have to choose between "familiarity" and "transparency," the resistance to migration disappears.

The market always rewards the projects that shout slogans first, but in the end, it’s usually those quietly building and continuously validating at the foundational level who remain.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestorvip
· 11-22 19:57
Another "real migration has happened" promo piece, but does Hydro's data really hold up under scrutiny? --- Order book crushing tier-2 exchanges? I'd like to see the actual trading volume comparison behind that "crushing." --- Sounds nice, but at the end of the day, it's still about waiting for institutions to truly enter the space in large numbers. How much are these current stories really worth? --- They got the pain point of liquidity islands right, but building the infrastructure takes time. Don't be too optimistic with the timeline. --- I like this perspective. It's true the market rewards noise, but long-term profits still belong to the silent builders. --- That private bank case sounds good, but one Hong Kong bank ≠ full-scale migration of traditional finance. The wording needs to be more cautious. --- The real reason institutions choose this path is to lower learning costs. That's more effective than any decentralization idealism. --- Wait, did Hydro really surpass tier-2 exchanges for a whole week? Where did this data come from? Can someone dig up the source? --- Order book DEXs are definitely underestimated in this sector, but competition is on the way. It's hard to say how long the first-mover advantage will last.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoetvip
· 11-22 17:50
Alright, finally someone is getting to the point. Those who keep hyping up RWA, but after all that, the liquidity is dead as a doornail—I just laugh and keep quiet. --- This order book model is exactly what institutions go for, no need for any education, they can use it right away. This is what real disruptive innovation looks like. --- Wait, did Hydro really outperform the second tier this week? I didn't see any data—can you drop a link, man? --- To put it simply, it all comes down to one thing—liquidity. Tokenization without liquidity is just a paper tiger, no matter how fancy it is. --- Ha, telling the infrastructure story again. But this time it actually seems different, since there are real case studies backing it up. --- That last line hit home—those shouting slogans have already been burned once, and the ones still around are quietly making a fortune.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathonervip
· 11-22 17:45
been saying this for months—infrastructure plays always win the marathon, but nobody wants to hear it. they're too busy chasing the shiny rwa narratives. hydro quietly doing 2x volume of tier-2 cex? that's the accumulation phase nobody talks about, that's the real inflection point.
Reply0
ProxyCollectorvip
· 11-22 17:33
Really, don't be fooled by those conceptual hype. Order books quietly eat away at market share; institutions don't care what you say, they only look at whether it can be used. Hydro crushes the secondary exchanges; this is the reality. --- In simple terms, liquidity is a matter of life and death. If RWA is brought on-chain but no one trades it, it's useless. Whoever can excel in the Secondary Market wins. --- The key is still to drop the psychological barriers. Don't make it so complicated; institutional traders really don't want to learn about Gas fees and that sort of thing. --- Wait, why didn't I think of this logic before? The real revolution is in infrastructure, not in those grand concepts that people shout about every day. --- Hong Kong private banks using public chain for settlement of real projects? This is indeed different; it's not the PPT financing model. --- I somewhat believe it now. The market rewards those who shout slogans, but those who survive until the end are the ones who quietly build the foundation.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatientvip
· 11-22 17:25
Wow, finally someone clarified it, not all concepts can be monetized. The order book route is indeed ruthless, institutions just eat this set, they can go on-chain without changing habits, this is called dimensionality reduction attack. That bunch of project party keeps boasting about tokenization being so revolutionary, but the liquidity is like a ghost town, what’s the use? Infrastructure work suffers the most, nobody remembers you, but without you, nothing can run.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)