Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Spot on. That insider allocation ratio raises eyebrows, and frankly, most teams completely lowball their liquidity needs. When reality hits and those numbers don't add up? That's when things get messy. We've seen this pattern play out before—underestimating liquidity requirements usually catches up with projects eventually. The math has to work, or the market will make it work for you.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 55m ago
Ha, that number in the team list has never been correct, it's bound to crash sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEyevip
· 1h ago
It is indeed easy to mess up when the numbers don't match, which is why those projects with optimistic forecasts didn't really go anywhere later.
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployervip
· 1h ago
Ngl, it's the same old trick again. The internal distribution ratio is obviously absurd, and the teams are just blindly estimating liquidity needs.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObservervip
· 1h ago
What real projects fear most is having issues with liquidity... Poor internal allocation ratios really look bad.
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLongervip
· 1h ago
This insider allocation ratio, I saw through it a long time ago. Bottom fishing until now is just like this. Averaging down and adding positions until fully loaded—if you believe, in the end you just have to hold on and not move.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)