A major player just secured $500M at a $40B valuation, positioning itself as infrastructure for digital assets beyond BTC. But here's the question everyone should be asking: what actual infrastructure are they really building? The funding round sounds impressive on paper, yet the core value proposition remains fuzzy. Are we looking at genuine innovation in alternative asset rails, or just another overvalued narrative riding the crypto wave? When valuations hit these heights, the infrastructure claims better deliver something tangible.

BTC1.02%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MevWhisperervip
· 1h ago
It's just a machine for playing people for suckers.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomistvip
· 1h ago
statistically speaking, 87.2% of "infrastructure plays" end up as evolutionary dead-ends...
Reply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 2h ago
Suckers' appearance fee has increased again.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunnervip
· 2h ago
Everything is for Be Played for Suckers.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 2h ago
Who still believes these valuation numbers?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)