Analysis: The US and Iran may adopt a strategy of negotiating while engaging in conflict.

金色财经_ · 2026-03-27T10:27:23+00:00

On March 27th, Iran responded to the ceasefire proposal from the United States, indicating a possible easing of their stance. Experts point out that both the US and Iran are unwilling to escalate the conflict in the short term, but they are unable to reach negotiations that benefit both sides, and the resolution of the conflict may be delayed.

金色财经_

2026-03-27 10:27:23

Abstract generation in progress

Golden Finance reports that on March 27, Iran has officially responded to the ceasefire agreement proposed by the United States, which includes 15 points. Does this mean Iran’s stance is easing, or does Iran want to gain more “leverage” in the negotiations? Also, while moving the talks forward, the United States may continue to deploy additional troops to the Middle East. What does this “fight while negotiating” trend imply? Will the risk of conflict in the Middle East continue to drag on? Qin Tian, deputy director of the Middle East Research Institute under the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, analyzed that in the short term, both the U.S. and Iran are unwilling to rashly escalate this war. However, at the same time, neither side can reach a result that is beneficial to both through negotiations. The difficult question of how the two sides intend to end the war is being postponed for now, so that each can buy time to think and make decisions. However, while the risk of escalation in the U.S.-Iran conflict is being deferred, it is also growing. (CCTV International News)

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.