Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Recent policy adjustments on social media platforms have affected many projects in the InfoFi sector. Projects such as Kaito, CookieDAO, Wallchain Quacks, ProtoKOLs, Zentry, Arbus, FiveRep, Ethos, Mirra, and Fantasy Top are facing strategic adjustment pressures. These projects, which rely on social data mining and user feedback, need to reevaluate their business models and operational directions under the changing platform rules. Industry observers point out that this wave of policy changes may push the InfoFi ecosystem to improve its compliance infrastructure. It also serves as a wake-up call for early-stage projects—over-reliance on a single platform poses systemic risks, and multi-chain deployment and diversification of data sources have become urgent issues.
Kaito should have realized this day would come. Going all-in on social data means being prepared for being harvested
Listen to these words: compliance building, diversified data sources... sounds good, but it's just helplessness forced by circumstances
Single platform risk? Should have understood that long ago, a bunch of latecomers
Now it's better, we have to see how project teams shift the blame to the platform
The entire InfoFi sector feels like gambling, sooner or later something will go wrong
Actually, they didn't expect that X/Twitter's move would be so fierce
Multi-chain deployment sounds simple, but in reality, it's a big expense. Small projects are doomed
Relying on a single data source is inherently a sin. It's really late to realize that now
This time, they will probably have to go through another round of cleanup, the doomed ones deserve to die
It was about time someone poured cold water on InfoFi. Relying on a single platform = suicide.
Kaito and the others have paid their tuition this time, but if newcomers don't learn from it, they'll just repeat the mistake.
Instead of waiting to be cut off, it's better to start diversifying data sources now... By the way, who is deploying across multiple chains?
The dependency on a single platform, I’ve said it would backfire long ago. Now it’s happening, and they have to start blooming again.
Compliance is like putting a bridle on a unicorn. At first, it’s uncomfortable, but later you realize it’s the cost of staying alive.
Watching Kaito and others adjust their strategies, I can’t tell if I feel distressed or relieved... Anyway, diversifying data sources is inevitable. It’s not too late to realize this now, even if forced.
The platform crashes as soon as it adjusts, indicating that these projects didn't have much real value to begin with
Multi-chain deployment data diversification... sounds very professional, but in reality, it's just patching vulnerabilities
Kaito should have seen this coming; betting on a single platform will eventually backfire
As soon as the social platform makes a move, these InfoFi projects have to be reorganized. To put it nicely, it's compliance building; to be blunt, it's being forced to change course.
The issue of over-reliance on a single platform should have been addressed long ago, and now realizing it is a bit late.
Multi-chain and multi-data sources sound good, but the reality of implementation is another matter.