The Panama Canal Effect of the Port of Hormuz: Companies pay up to $4 million to get ahead of the Panama Canal

According to PBS NewsHour citing a report by the Associated Press, since Iran and the United States formed a standoff at the Strait of Hormuz, global shipping operators have massively rerouted via the Panama Canal. Temporary toll costs have reportedly reached as high as 4 million dollars—an exceptionally rare level in recent years—reflecting how Middle East blockades are rewriting the global maritime shipping cost structure.

The auction mechanism lets the highest bidder jump the line—ships without reservations can’t wait

The Panama Canal normally uses fixed rates with a reservation system, but if there’s no reservation in advance, shipping companies can only bid for transit windows through an auction mechanism run by the canal’s management authority. This was originally an emergency channel used only by a small number of urgent shipments, but during the standoff in the Strait of Hormuz, demand far exceeded the canal’s day-to-day throughput, causing the winning bid amounts to surge.

Canal administrator Ricaurte Vásquez said that over the past few weeks, demand has spiked and the winning prices have ballooned quickly. “The no-reservation option is to wait out at sea outside Panama City for several days.” For tankers and container ships that need to reach shore urgently, the contract penalties caused by waiting time and the costs of holding inventory often far exceed the price premium paid at auction.

Management authority’s evidence: a tanker was temporarily rerouted to Singapore and paid an extra 4 million dollars

Vásquez disclosed the most representative case: a ship originally scheduled to deliver fuel to Europe was forced to reroute to Singapore due to the geopolitical situation and, through the auction, secured a transit window; in the end, it paid an additional 4 million dollars. “They originally wanted to send the fuel to Europe, but then it was rerouted to Singapore because Singapore’s inventories are nearly depleted and it has to arrive immediately.”

For some operators, even after adding the 4 million dollars in auction fees, rerouting through the Panama Canal is still more cost-effective than going through the Strait of Hormuz. Multiple shipping companies told Fortune that, at this stage, the “safer and cheaper” option is to reroute—this remark directly reflects how the market is pricing in the risk premium for the Strait of Hormuz.

MSC Francesca was detained; Panama protests to Tehran

Tensions between Panama and Iran have also been escalating. Earlier this month, Panama’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs formally protested Iran’s detention of MSC Francesca—the ship flying the Panama flag and operated by Italy’s MSC Group—which was forcibly detained by Tehran near the Strait of Hormuz. The Panamanian government accused Iran of “illegal seizure” of the vessel and demanded the immediate release of the crew and cargo.

With canal auction amounts surging and ships being detained, global maritime insurance providers have begun listing the Strait of Hormuz as a “high-risk war zone” surcharge. This means that even if Iran and the United States reach a ceasefire in the future, the portion of freight rates that structurally rises will be difficult to return to 2025 levels in the short term. After Trump announced on the 22nd of this month that he would extend the Iran ceasefire agreement, the situation on the ground has still not been meaningfully eased.

This article Hormuz port effect: Companies pay up to 4 million dollars to抢 over the Panama Canal first appeared in Lian News ABMedia.