Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
Gate MCP
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
"One of the founders of prediction market theory" Robin Hanson does not support a complete ban on insider trading for Kalshi and Polymarket.
Deep Tide TechFlow News, April 26 — According to Fortune magazine, as Kalshi and Polymarket accelerate cooperation with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to combat insider trading, Robin Hanson, one of the founders of prediction market theory and a professor of economics at George Mason University, publicly expressed disapproval, stating that “insider participation in trading” is itself the core value of prediction markets. Previously, the U.S. Department of Justice charged a U.S. military soldier with using confidential intelligence to bet on a Venezuelan raid on Polymarket and illegally profited about $400k. In response, Robin Hanson said, “You want them to trade. You want prices to be as accurate as possible; the purpose of the market is to aid decision-making.”
Robin Hanson believes that, like all economic models: insiders will trade, informed parties will buy “certain” contracts, thereby pushing prices upward and bringing them closer to the truth. If insiders do not participate in betting, the information discovery function of prediction markets will be greatly weakened, and markets cannot reflect real outcomes faster than news media or polls. Insider trading is also widespread in traditional financial markets, yet regulation often only addresses a small number of cases. Prediction markets and journalistic investigations are fundamentally similar mechanisms for making information more quickly public and should not be completely banned. Hanson’s compromise suggestion is: any legislation prohibiting government employees from participating in prediction market trading should, under the same logic, also prohibit them from talking with journalists.