Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I really have mixed feelings about that economic model in blockchain games: at first, daily output feels like opening the floodgates, watching the pool get lively, but once inflation kicks in, everyone's shared goal becomes "sell what was produced today quickly." To put it plainly, if you don't sell, you're just a cushion for others to exit. The higher the output = the greater the selling pressure, and if demand doesn't keep up, it can only rely on more newcomers to absorb it. When that can't keep up, people start blaming the project team for "producing more again."
Recently, new L1/L2 incentives to boost TVL have the same vibe. Veteran users complain, "Mining, selling, and withdrawing" is no exaggeration: the rewards aren't valuable, just an illusion of time lag... Anyway, when I see "high output + locked-in acceleration," my first thought is to figure out who is taking my place.
Next time, I might only play small early-stage positions, set a very ugly take-profit line, and leave once it's hit; how do you judge whether a pool is "growing" or "overdrawing its acceleration"?