Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
My phone just popped up a red dot again, saying that a certain platform has "optimized" the secondary NFT royalty... I clicked in and saw the same old story: when transactions happen, they talk about creators, but when the market is bad, they start calculating costs. Honestly, if royalties rely entirely on self-discipline, the bull market can still pretend to be civilized; when risk appetite drops and liquidity tightens, everyone immediately only cares about slippage and transaction fees.
Recently, the wave of AI Agents and automated trading also feels similar: the narrative is hyped up, but when it comes to on-chain interactions, no one wants to pay much attention to security details. Anyway, my current thought is that creators shouldn't treat royalties as an "obvious cash flow," but more as a pricing power gradually gained through products, communities, and rights; the market shouldn't pretend to have morals either—ultimately, macro rhythms decide who can set the rules. That's all for now.