The “Ice and Fire” of the Negotiation Table and the Battlefield—Islamabad Talks Kick Off, and the Middle East Situation Remains at a Crossroads

In the early hours of April 11 local time, Pakistani officials confirmed that U.S.-Iran talks would be held that day at the Serena Hotel in Islamabad. Just hours before the talks began, Iran issued a statement with an ultimatum-like show of force—if an agreement acceptable to both “Iran and the resistance forces” is not reached, and fighting reignites, Iran will launch a “destructive strike” against Israeli and U.S. interests in the Middle East. At the same time, Israel’s large-scale airstrikes on Lebanon have already resulted in more than 350 deaths, the Strait of Hormuz remains under strict control, and the Houthis claim they attacked a U.S. aircraft carrier. Between the negotiation table and the battlefield, a “game of ice and fire” is unfolding simultaneously.

I. Islamabad: Opening of U.S.-Iran Talks and a “Hard Fight”

Under a tightly coordinated deployment of more than 10,000 security personnel by Pakistan, the U.S.-Iran talks opened at the Serena Hotel in Islamabad. The Iranian delegation was led by Parliament Speaker Kalibaf; members include Foreign Minister Araghchi, Central Bank Governor Hemmati, as well as experts in multiple fields such as security, politics, military, economy, and law. The U.S. delegation was led by Vice President Vance; members include Presidential Envoy Wittkof and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law.

Before the negotiations began, the parties’ statements signaled that this would be a “hard fight.”

Iran’s position is firm. In a written address, the Supreme Leader Mujtaba Khamenei clearly put forward “three points”: aggressors must compensate for losses; management of the Strait of Hormuz will enter a new phase; Iran will never give up its legitimate rights, and it will treat all “resistance fronts” in the region as a single whole. Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Ravanchi also confirmed that Iran will use the previously proposed “Ten-Point Plan” as the basis for negotiations, including recognition of Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz and acceptance of Iran carrying out uranium enrichment activities. Foreign Minister Araghchi simultaneously emphasized that a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran also applies to Lebanon, and Israel must stop its military actions against Lebanon.

The U.S. also entered the talks with a tough posture. Trump said that if an agreement with Iran cannot be reached, the U.S. will restore military operations with greater force; the U.S. is “redeploying,” and warships have been loaded with “the most advanced weapons.” He also said bluntly that besides controlling the Strait of Hormuz, Iran “has no cards to play.” Vance warned Iran not to try to “play tricks” on the U.S., but at the same time said that if Iran is willing to negotiate “in good faith,” the United States will remain open.

As for the format of the talks, it is still unclear whether there will be direct, face-to-face meetings. Reports suggest that the U.S. and Iran may first meet separately with Pakistan, and then decide whether to move on to direct negotiations. Trump predicted that the outcome of the negotiations would be clear within 24 hours.

II. Lebanon: The Fires Have Not Gone Out, and a Ceasefire Is Not Yet Here

Outside the negotiation table in Islamabad, the skies over Lebanon are still filled with the smell of gunpowder.

Since Israel launched a large-scale airstrike on Lebanon, the casualty figures have continued to climb. According to the latest statistics from Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health, Israel’s airstrikes on the 8th caused 357 deaths, with another 1,223 injured. Since fighting between Israel and Lebanon reignited on March 2, Israel’s attacks on Lebanon have cumulatively caused 1,953 deaths and 6,303 injuries, and more than 1 million people have been forced to flee their homes. On the eve of the talks, Israel carried out an airstrike on the southern Lebanese city of Nabatiyeh, killing 13 members of the security forces.

Notably, there remains a serious divergence between the U.S. and Iran over whether a ceasefire agreement covers Lebanon. Iran insists that a ceasefire in Lebanon is a prerequisite for negotiations. Kalibaf made it clear that the two points of consensus—ceasefire in Lebanon and the unfreezing of Iranian assets frozen before the start of talks—“must be completed before negotiations begin.”

Meanwhile, diplomatic channels are being opened with difficulty. On the evening of the 10th, the Lebanese presidential palace issued a statement saying that the ambassadors of Lebanon and Israel to the United States had spoken by phone, and both sides agreed that on April 14, the first meeting would be held at the U.S. Department of State to discuss announcing a ceasefire and launching negotiations. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said he had instructed the Israeli government to conduct direct negotiations with the Lebanese government, but he also made clear that “there is no ceasefire,” and that during the talks, there will be no discussion of a ceasefire with Hezbollah.

III. Strait of Hormuz: Strictly Controlled, Extremely Limited Reopening of Navigation

After the U.S. and Iran announced a “two-week ceasefire,” the situation in the Strait of Hormuz has not been as far-reaching as the U.S. claims that it is “reopening.”

According to reports from Iran on the 10th, in the past 24 hours only 4 ships passed through the Strait, including one Iranian oil tanker and one Russian oil tanker. A report released by the British maritime analytics firm VesselsValue shows that the ceasefire has not brought about a full recovery of commercial shipping, and the standard navigation routes through the strait have basically not been used. On the 8th, only 5 bulk carriers were tracked departing port; on the 9th, activity increased, but mainly involved small vessels or shipping related to Iran.

More concerning is that Iran has clearly stated that, in response to Israel’s violations of the ceasefire and its attacks on Lebanon, the Strait of Hormuz has remained closed over the past two days. A member of Iran’s parliamentary National Security Committee emphasized that the current transit-control measures are extremely strict, and even non-hostile ships cannot obtain transit permission by paying transit fees.

The data shows that about 3,200 vessels remain stranded west of the Strait of Hormuz, including about 800 oil tankers and cargo ships. Shipping companies generally take alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope; the conventional route’s length from Europe to the Gulf region has been extended from about 25 days to about 41 days, and transport costs have increased by about 25%.

The U.S. is trying to control the narrative. Trump claimed that the Strait of Hormuz “will reopen very soon, and in any case it will open.” Hashid, the director of the White House National Economic Council, also said that the strait is expected to resume navigation within the next two months, and that the U.S. has drawn up “backup plans.” But analysts point out that April 8 to 10 is the initial verification window, while April 11 to 14 is the critical decision-making window for shipping companies—restoring shipping industry traffic to pre-war levels may still take months.

IV. Yemen’s Houthis: A New Round of Threats Emerges

Just as the U.S.-Iran negotiations kicked off, Yemen’s Houthi forces issued their latest warning.

On April 9, Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi said in a televised address that U.S. and Israeli attacks are splitting the “resistance front,” and the Houthis will never sit idly by. On the 11th, Houthi spokesperson Yahya Saree further claimed that in the “past few hours,” the group attacked the U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman and its accompanying vessels deployed in the northern Red Sea, using cruise missiles and drones to carry out the strike.

The signal released by this statement is very clear: if the U.S. and Israel continue to pressure Lebanon, the situation in the Red Sea and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait could rapidly heat up. The Houthis’ previous ship-attacking actions have already driven up Red Sea shipping costs sharply; if the fighting spreads further, the global energy supply chain will face a double threat from both ends—through the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

At the same time, British media reported on the 10th—citing informed officials—that the UK will hold a new round of talks with allies next week to discuss how to restore Strait of Hormuz shipping without paying Iran “tolls.”

V. The Bill of War: Numbers Will Not Disappear With a Ceasefire

No matter what agreement is reached at the negotiation table in Islamabad, the costs already paid by this war cannot be undone.

Data released by the World Health Organization shows that since February 28, large-scale U.S.-Israeli military strikes against Iran have resulted in nearly 2,400 deaths in Iran, more than 32,000 injuries, and another 3.2 million people displaced. Adding nearly 2,000 deaths and more than 1 million displaced people in Lebanon, this conflict has caused more than 4,000 deaths and more than 4.2 million people to be made homeless.

On the political front, the U.S. consumer confidence index has fallen to 47.6, down 10.7% from the previous month, hitting a record low. The president of the World Bank warned that even if U.S.-Iran ceasefire is maintained, the Middle East war will still have ripple effects on the global economy.

VI. Key Time Nodes: Future Uncertainties

The April 11 U.S.-Iran Islamabad talks—success or failure hinges on this. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz said directly that “success or failure for achieving a permanent ceasefire hinges on this.” Trump predicted that the outcome would be clear within 24 hours, but Iran insists that “negotiations will only begin if the U.S. accepts Iran’s preconditions.”

The April 14 trilateral talks involving Lebanon, Israel, and the U.S.—on that day, the ambassadors of Lebanon and Israel to the United States will hold their first meeting at the U.S. Department of State to discuss announcing a ceasefire and launching negotiations.

Meanwhile, the UK will convene a meeting of allies next week to discuss plans for a “free navigation” through the Strait of Hormuz; the threat of Houthi attacks is still ongoing; more than 3,200 ships remain waiting west of the strait— the future of the Middle East situation remains unresolved.

---

Conclusion: The negotiation table in Islamabad has finally been set, but the sound of artillery outside the talks has never stopped. In the face of rescue workers searching through the ruins of Lebanon, thousands of ships waiting on both sides of the Strait of Hormuz, and more than 4 million displaced people in Iran and Lebanon, this “ice and fire” game continues. The two-week ceasefire has entered its fourth day, but real Middle East peace—if it really exists—likely won’t be revealed within 24 hours. The only certainty is that every day of delay keeps adding to an already heavy war bill.
#Gate廣場四月發帖挑戰