In cryptocurrency trading, every order you place falls into one of two categories: Maker or Taker. While this choice may seem simple, it directly impacts your trading fees, execution speed, and ultimately your profit and loss outcomes. To become a savvy trader, you need to understand the fundamental differences between these two order mechanisms.
Taker Orders: The Cost of Fast Execution
When you urgently need to execute a trade at the current market price, you are effectively using a Taker order. Taker orders match directly with existing orders on the order book, consuming liquidity from the market, which is why they are also called “liquidity takers.”
From a trading perspective, Taker orders are suitable for traders who prioritize execution speed over cost. Whether you want to quickly enter the market to seize opportunities or need to close positions urgently to cut losses, Taker orders ensure your instructions are executed immediately. However, this convenience of speed comes at a cost—Taker fees are usually significantly higher than Maker fees.
For example, in perpetual contract trading, Taker fees can reach 0.055% or more, meaning you lose more capital per trade. For frequent traders and speculators, these costs can accumulate rapidly, exerting a substantial pressure on overall profitability.
Maker Orders: Incentivizing Liquidity Provision
In contrast, Maker orders are your active limit orders placed into the order book, waiting for other traders to match with your order. During this process, you become a “liquidity provider,” adding depth and stability to the market.
Exchanges incentivize Maker behavior by offering noticeably lower fees as a reward. Typically, Maker fees are around 0.02%, much lower than Taker rates. The logic behind this design is clear: market makers increase liquidity by placing orders, making it easier for other traders to execute, and therefore should be rewarded with fee discounts.
Maker orders require patience and market insight. You need to set your limit prices within the bid-ask spread and wait for the market to reach your order. This passive trading approach is especially advantageous for technical traders or those with a long-term perspective.
How Fee Differences Affect Trading Profits and Losses
The theoretical differences are abstract; let’s look at a concrete example to see how fee choices impact actual returns.
Suppose you plan to trade a BTCUSDT perpetual contract, opening a position of 2 BTC at an entry price of $60,000 USDT, and closing at $61,000 USDT. Ignoring fees, this trade yields a profit of $2,000 USDT.
Trader A: Uses Maker orders for both opening and closing
Opening fee: 2 × 60,000 × 0.02% = $24 USDT
Closing fee: 2 × 61,000 × 0.02% = $24.40 USDT
Net profit: $2,000 − $24 − $24.40 = $1,951.60 USDT
Trader B: Uses Taker orders for both opening and closing
Opening fee: 2 × 60,000 × 0.055% = $66 USDT
Closing fee: 2 × 61,000 × 0.055% = $67.10 USDT
Net profit: $2,000 − $66 − $67.10 = $1,866.90 USDT
While the gross profit is the same, Trader A’s net profit is $84.70 higher than Trader B’s. This difference might seem small per trade, but for active traders executing hundreds of trades per month, these costs can compound significantly, impacting overall profitability.
Core Comparison: Maker vs. Taker Orders
Aspect
Maker Order
Taker Order
Execution Method
Enter order into the order book, waiting for match
Immediate match with existing orders
Speed
May require waiting
Instantaneous
Fees
Around 0.02% (discounted rate)
Around 0.055% (standard rate)
Suitable Order Types
Limit orders
Market orders or limit orders
Market Role
Liquidity provider
Liquidity consumer
Best For
Patient, long-term traders
Traders needing quick execution
How to Effectively Use Maker Orders
If you want to benefit from fee advantages, here are key steps to place Maker orders:
Choose Limit Orders: Use limit orders instead of market orders in your trading interface.
Enable Passive Orders: Check the “Passive Order” or similar option to ensure your order is recognized as Maker.
Strategic Pricing: Set your limit prices competitively based on current best bid and ask.
When going long: set your buy limit below the best ask.
When going short: set your sell limit above the best bid.
Be Patient: Allow your order to stay on the order book until it gets matched.
A critical reminder: if your limit order price is too aggressive (e.g., buying at a price too close to the current market price), it will execute immediately against existing market orders, turning it into a Taker order, which defeats the purpose.
Conclusion: Fee Strategy and Long-Term Profitability
Choosing between Maker and Taker orders is not just a technical detail but a strategic decision. While lower fees may seem like a small saving, over the long term, these advantages compound through the power of compound interest.
Smart traders adapt their approach based on market conditions: using Maker orders when not in a rush and aiming for specific price points to reduce costs; resorting to Taker orders when quick execution is necessary or markets are highly volatile. Understanding the core differences between these order types helps optimize trading costs and develop more scientific trading plans.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Complete Analysis of Maker and Taker Orders: Understanding How the Two Trading Methods Affect Your Costs
In cryptocurrency trading, every order you place falls into one of two categories: Maker or Taker. While this choice may seem simple, it directly impacts your trading fees, execution speed, and ultimately your profit and loss outcomes. To become a savvy trader, you need to understand the fundamental differences between these two order mechanisms.
Taker Orders: The Cost of Fast Execution
When you urgently need to execute a trade at the current market price, you are effectively using a Taker order. Taker orders match directly with existing orders on the order book, consuming liquidity from the market, which is why they are also called “liquidity takers.”
From a trading perspective, Taker orders are suitable for traders who prioritize execution speed over cost. Whether you want to quickly enter the market to seize opportunities or need to close positions urgently to cut losses, Taker orders ensure your instructions are executed immediately. However, this convenience of speed comes at a cost—Taker fees are usually significantly higher than Maker fees.
For example, in perpetual contract trading, Taker fees can reach 0.055% or more, meaning you lose more capital per trade. For frequent traders and speculators, these costs can accumulate rapidly, exerting a substantial pressure on overall profitability.
Maker Orders: Incentivizing Liquidity Provision
In contrast, Maker orders are your active limit orders placed into the order book, waiting for other traders to match with your order. During this process, you become a “liquidity provider,” adding depth and stability to the market.
Exchanges incentivize Maker behavior by offering noticeably lower fees as a reward. Typically, Maker fees are around 0.02%, much lower than Taker rates. The logic behind this design is clear: market makers increase liquidity by placing orders, making it easier for other traders to execute, and therefore should be rewarded with fee discounts.
Maker orders require patience and market insight. You need to set your limit prices within the bid-ask spread and wait for the market to reach your order. This passive trading approach is especially advantageous for technical traders or those with a long-term perspective.
How Fee Differences Affect Trading Profits and Losses
The theoretical differences are abstract; let’s look at a concrete example to see how fee choices impact actual returns.
Suppose you plan to trade a BTCUSDT perpetual contract, opening a position of 2 BTC at an entry price of $60,000 USDT, and closing at $61,000 USDT. Ignoring fees, this trade yields a profit of $2,000 USDT.
Trader A: Uses Maker orders for both opening and closing
Trader B: Uses Taker orders for both opening and closing
While the gross profit is the same, Trader A’s net profit is $84.70 higher than Trader B’s. This difference might seem small per trade, but for active traders executing hundreds of trades per month, these costs can compound significantly, impacting overall profitability.
Core Comparison: Maker vs. Taker Orders
How to Effectively Use Maker Orders
If you want to benefit from fee advantages, here are key steps to place Maker orders:
A critical reminder: if your limit order price is too aggressive (e.g., buying at a price too close to the current market price), it will execute immediately against existing market orders, turning it into a Taker order, which defeats the purpose.
Conclusion: Fee Strategy and Long-Term Profitability
Choosing between Maker and Taker orders is not just a technical detail but a strategic decision. While lower fees may seem like a small saving, over the long term, these advantages compound through the power of compound interest.
Smart traders adapt their approach based on market conditions: using Maker orders when not in a rush and aiming for specific price points to reduce costs; resorting to Taker orders when quick execution is necessary or markets are highly volatile. Understanding the core differences between these order types helps optimize trading costs and develop more scientific trading plans.