Project teams are also made up of people


People have human nature
And once human nature crosses the "first default," it’s no longer a psychological hurdle but a cost issue
Default once, and there will be a second time; changing the rules once, and there will be countless times
Because they have already verified one thing: defaulting can be forgiven by the market
Defaulting is either 0 times or countless times
So I have a strict rule:
Whenever a project team defaults once or temporarily changes the rules once, immediately downgrade their status, and no longer invest new funds
Project teams will not share dividends just because community members are kind and tolerant multiple times
Credit is the only moat in this industry. Once someone has personally dismantled that moat, they have essentially told the market:
They will do it again in the future
You can bet they will improve, but this project team is different
I only do one thing:
Vote with my feet
What about you?
Would you blacklist a project completely after one default? Or are you willing to give it more chances?
Will the arrival of Web4 solve this problem?
Will autonomous evolving AI have human nature? I look forward to seeing these changes
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)