Recently, Zhu Su, one of the founders of Three Arrows Capital, shared a provocative analysis of current Bitcoin market trends. According to reports from BlockBeats, his observations focus on the withdrawal of early investors from the market—a phenomenon that, contrary to what many might think, could represent a healthy development for the ecosystem.
The Natural Succession of Holders in the Bitcoin Market
Since the early days of digital currency, original investors have gradually been exiting the market. He emphasizes that each distribution of assets positively contributes to long-term financial health and the stability of Bitcoin’s monetary value. This turnover of participants is not a sign of weakness but a natural characteristic of an evolving market.
Bitcoin Transcends Individual Dependence
A key point of the analysis is that Bitcoin’s survival does not rely solely on purchases or holdings by specific individuals. If it did, Su argues, the network would have disappeared long ago. This structural independence of Bitcoin from the will of any individual holder is fundamental to its resilience as a monetary asset.
Reflecting on Public Figures and Corporate Investments
Su took the opportunity to comment on Michael Saylor of MicroStrategy, noting that his role as a leading figure masks the reality of investments. MSTR shareholders are those who effectively bear the risk exposure associated with Bitcoin in the corporate strategy. This distinction between symbolic leadership and actual exposure is important for understanding market dynamics.
Caution Against Premature Market Reentry
After months of silence since mid-September of the previous year, Su reappeared in the crypto debate at the end of January. His recent reflections include comments on the losses suffered by investors like Yi Lihua and 1011. Both incurred significant losses by re-entering the market hastily after selling at the peak, driven by overconfidence in their predictive abilities. This caution serves as a reminder of the inherent risks of overconfidence in trading.
Implications for Bitcoin’s Future
Su’s re-engagement in public debate marks a broader moment of reflection on how Bitcoin evolves with different generations of investors. His perspective suggests that the exit of old holders does not threaten the ecosystem—in fact, it contributes to greater decentralization and long-term value stability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Zhu Su Offers Perspective on Bitcoin Investment Cycles
Recently, Zhu Su, one of the founders of Three Arrows Capital, shared a provocative analysis of current Bitcoin market trends. According to reports from BlockBeats, his observations focus on the withdrawal of early investors from the market—a phenomenon that, contrary to what many might think, could represent a healthy development for the ecosystem.
The Natural Succession of Holders in the Bitcoin Market
Since the early days of digital currency, original investors have gradually been exiting the market. He emphasizes that each distribution of assets positively contributes to long-term financial health and the stability of Bitcoin’s monetary value. This turnover of participants is not a sign of weakness but a natural characteristic of an evolving market.
Bitcoin Transcends Individual Dependence
A key point of the analysis is that Bitcoin’s survival does not rely solely on purchases or holdings by specific individuals. If it did, Su argues, the network would have disappeared long ago. This structural independence of Bitcoin from the will of any individual holder is fundamental to its resilience as a monetary asset.
Reflecting on Public Figures and Corporate Investments
Su took the opportunity to comment on Michael Saylor of MicroStrategy, noting that his role as a leading figure masks the reality of investments. MSTR shareholders are those who effectively bear the risk exposure associated with Bitcoin in the corporate strategy. This distinction between symbolic leadership and actual exposure is important for understanding market dynamics.
Caution Against Premature Market Reentry
After months of silence since mid-September of the previous year, Su reappeared in the crypto debate at the end of January. His recent reflections include comments on the losses suffered by investors like Yi Lihua and 1011. Both incurred significant losses by re-entering the market hastily after selling at the peak, driven by overconfidence in their predictive abilities. This caution serves as a reminder of the inherent risks of overconfidence in trading.
Implications for Bitcoin’s Future
Su’s re-engagement in public debate marks a broader moment of reflection on how Bitcoin evolves with different generations of investors. His perspective suggests that the exit of old holders does not threaten the ecosystem—in fact, it contributes to greater decentralization and long-term value stability.